That Dress is a Full On Monet – Fashionista Fash
 

So,yves saint laurent sale, I’ve been shopping a lot lately.
I’m doing my part to stimulate our poor economy, obviously trying to ignore the fact that I should probably be funneling my extra pennies elsewhere, but I’m also going through post-Paris depression,Christian Louboutin 2010 new collection, so it’s ok.
Anyway, I’ve been noticing a lot of what Hayley calls,Louboutin Slingbacks, “Trompe-l’≈ìil,christian louboutin sandals, but for clothes.”
Like an Elizabeth & James blazer that comes with the sleeves pre-ruched and an Alexander Wang dress that’s supposed to make people think you’re wearing a t-shirt tucked into a skirt. There was a grey knit tank at Otte that came with a scarf sewn onto the neck, which really confused me,cheap louboutin slingback, and a vest attached to the inside of a blazer somewhere I don’t remember.
I can’t, for the life of me,Christian Louboutin, understand the point of this. I understand the initial thought of, “Hey,yves saint laurent sale, it might be easier if I don’t have to worry about the styling details myself.” But what if it’s cold and you want to pull your sleeves down,jimmy choo pumps, (even though I always wear mine up, too)? Or what if you want to wear that t-shirt with your jeans instead of the skirt it’s sewn onto? And what if you want to wear the tank top but it’s 75 degrees outside and you don’t need a scarf?
Wouldn’t it be easier to just show the pieces styled together to give shoppers the right idea but let them decide how they want to wear it? Someone please explain.
Thanks.
Posted in:
Explain That Dress is a Full On Monet By Britt Aboutaleb Thursday,jimmy choo sale, Oct 16,laurent sandals sale, 2008 / 3:55 PM GMT -5