Customers shopping cart severing the ribs supermar
 

,vetement ralph lauren

incident

the morning of February 18 last year, before a lady to Lotus Wenshui store shopping, in the selection of goods, to be used in supermarket carts tally clerks bruises, Ms. Yu was sent to hospital immediately, and upon inspection the right rib tenderness 7-8, X-ray examination and the two sides after the CT examination was significant dislocation fractures of the ribs. Miss Yu a painful injury in the same year on February 20, February 28, March 19 several times to referral, Tongji Hospital,polo ralph lauren pas cher, Tongji University, and in March 19 by the X-ray examination revealed a right 5 -8 rib fractures.
controversy

Miss Yu asked unsuccessful Lotus supermarket and taken to court for compensation. Hearing, Lotus Chain Supermarket Co., Ltd. that has no objection to the accident, but damage to the diagnostic results should be based on hospital records and expert testimony to confirm the incident did not shoot the day before a lady found a fracture of the situation, Fracture review found a month later, the accident is difficult to identify a causal relationship with the Litigation, it is not agreed to Ms. claim.
check

proceedings, the court commissioned the Centre for Forensic and three of Ms. level of disability were identified,ralph lauren polo, the Centre issued July 5 this year, expert conclusion: The expert Miss Yu February 18, 2009 after being injured in supermarket management truck knocked down. Verification by the Principal, in Ms. February 18, 2009 injury until March 19, 2009 between radiography and damage not again. The sequelae of fractures of four ribs road traffic accidents is equivalent to ten disabled. Treatment of the injury the rest of the 90-120 day period of 20 nursing, nutrition, a period of 45 days.
decision

court held that the Lotus Supermarket tally man tally in the use of car accidentally hit the plaintiff, the conduct, job behavior, the defendant Lotus Supermarket liability. The court held that, although the plaintiff in the day of the incident ray examination did not show the existence of rib fractures, but taking into account the plaintiff in the February 18 to March 19 because of injury at several times between referral of pain to the hospital and do exist even if the rib fracture radiography examination also overlooked the special circumstances to confirm the plaintiff in the February 18, 2009 were injured with fractures result in considerable damage to a causal relationship.