(Reporter correspondent Song Hua Tang Hongjie Liu Yu) Xu people in the ATM access,
skechers shoes, the left hand is the person next to drag a bit, back to the moment in his bank card was transferred packet, then Cary's 6000 yuan money was taken away twice. Xu did not do a bank security obligation to the bank to court on the grounds, recently, Humen, Dongguan City, the second People's Court heard the case the court dismissed the claims of Xu.
instant bank card to be transferred back pack
this year, April 27 at 7 pm, Xu Humen, a self-help in a bank's ATM to withdraw funds in the bank ,
mbt chapa shoes, 200 yuan in the withdrawal button press wait for ATM money, the left hand by others dragged a bit, Xu subconsciously back. A thirties six meters tall and a few middle-aged man holding a bank card, asked him: Leave me alone. back to take out the 200 and was put to the lawless port card bank card. Criminals immediately stepped forward to operate ATMs,
mbt walking shoes, Xu card will go out.
Court: Bank through no fault
April 28 this year, Xu to the bank at a branch in Dongguan check that the card is 6000 yuan of deposits obtained in two go. Informed of this situation, Xu is on the same day to Humen, Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau Branch of Taiping local police station. Subsequently,
mbt outlet, Xu sued the bank of Humen, Dongguan City People's Court II Court, seeks compensation for the loss of 6,000 yuan.
's Court that because of Xu in the process of using bank cards negligence, not by ATM bank card taken away, resulting in bank cards stolen, the card money was stolen, it shall bear the resulting losses.
court said, according to the bank card agreement, where the password matches the cardholder transactions as authorized by me or my legal transactions, the bank bears only the authenticity of bank card and password identify the compatibility of obligations. Case, with the real criminals,
mbt shoes sale, and the correct password bank card withdrawals, the bank is not at fault, Xu asked banks to take responsibility for the reason not to set up on Xu's Application, the court shall not be supported. Therefore, the court made the ruling rejected the claim Xu, now the sentence has been effective.