Windows 7 may be favorable for the user, but the author Jack Wallen Quedui Windows are not good, he thought the Linux operating system in the field of the dominant matter of time. He wrote in a blog:
I think so, Microsoft's erroneous line has come to an end, there will be an alternative product, that is the Linux. Microsoft to release WindowsMe from the beginning when the vicious little snowball rolling, and the snowball getting bigger. In the Windows development and downs from time to time on the journey (of course, XP is a bright spot), but most of the time, the public no longer have
following is better than Linux, Linux will eventually ten reasons:
1, the ups and downs of the Windows version of
Microsoft can always trust the point is that your new operating system he never trusted. Let us look at the his
tory of major version:
* Windows 95: revolutionized the personal computer;
* Windows 98: attempt to based on the Windows 95 upgrade, but painful to fail;
* Windows Me: almost useless;
* Windows NT: trying to introduce enterprise-class applications in the operating system; but let such a thing up and running, we have to have the same IQ as Stephen Hawking can operate;
* Windows XP: Windows failed to return to the operating system. Since Windows 95 has no operating system, then this simple;
* Windows Vista: with Windows Me.
* Windows 7 can give us what?
2, consistent with the Linux versions listed in this
1 In contrast, Linux version is not only more and more consistent, and more. Of course, on the road to development will have less than satisfactory work (Fedora9 is one of them), but in general terms, Linux development has been moving forward. Over time, the introduction of almost every Linux version is progress and this progress is not limited to kernel. Now look at the desktop, end-user software, servers, security, management tools, etc., are to improve over time. Take a look at KDE4 development from 4.0 to 4.3 increases the number, whether it is application or system, the development of Linux are almost all you see forward.
3, the rising price of
Windows recently, a lot of time in the Microsoft manager who asked me if I have better things to replace Exchange. Why? Microsoft to change the Exchange's product licensing - for each user, every person to log on to Exchange server must have a product license. If you have 100 employees (including administrators) to log on to Exchange, then all of them pay. Larger companies and then, when you have to pay 500 Exchange product license for this time,
adidas golf shoes on sale 美日军方高官会见 美再呐, the situation is quite horrible. Taking into account the current economic form of licensing Microsoft products to take such a bold change is very ridiculous; when the world is facing serious economic downturn, Microsoft has taken such a toll barrier it is irresponsible, and should receive the condemnation.
4, stable Linux
prices correspond with the third article: the price of open source software licenses consistent - $ 0.00. When the manager asked me that Microsoft's choice of products to replace Exchange, I recommend eGroupware and Open-X-Change. Both are great group of software tools, even more than the more powerful Microsoft Exchange. eGroupware and Open-X-Change is very reliable, scalable, secure, and free. The only thing you need to pay for installation of their hardware. And the two do not limit the number of users, whether a user or 1000, the same is an excellent open source software.
5, Windows is not compatible
hardware compatibility of the hardware that Microsoft Vista is really a nightmare. Not only because MicrosoftVista not compatible with many peripheral devices, and it takes a supercomputer to run the assembly level of the operating system. Of course, this is good news for Intel, because of his profit from a great deal. Intel know that many people will install a new operating system in order to buy new hardware,
jordan 6 retro, and new hardware is more expensive because it is faster to run Vista. But even great hardware that can run at an alarming rate due to other operating systems,
ghd leopard, Vista will still get slow as a snail.
6, Linux hardware compatibility
correspond with this Article, Linux hardware compatibility also holds an advantage. To Xorg, for example, recently many developers use Linux graphical desktop to run XWindows server sansxorg.conf, mainly because the system detects the hardware has been getting better and better. As between your monitor and PC is not cheap KVM, Xorg and your display between the right to run X to be the best choice. With the latest version (eg Fedora 10), X configuration has become the last choice.
7, Windows's system. Looking back we will find the beginning we heard from the Redmond similar predictions. WindowsVista users once said it would change the way computer interface operation, but the fact is that we have become WindowsVista do not want to mention to mention the operating system. Of course, we still heard the prophecy that, before the succession of Windows98 and Windows Me said it would get for each user, it is more simple. True? But never removed the operating system really useful features almost all the rest that is browser and e-mail client, and other little things.
Everyone talked about the next Windows release will redefine the personal computer, but Microsoft has long been the ultimate performance of the public felt the fatigue and disappointment, the public will no longer look forward to any new things to happen. Media publicity still Windows7, but the public will continue to use XP, Microsoft's new operating system unless there is really nothing that can be useful to us. Of course,
alife everybody mid parachute, as usual, in the end no one knows when Windows7,
Aoraki network al-Qaeda leader called for killing Americans appeared, Microsoft has come and go, we are already used to it.
8: Linux transparency
with Article 7 of this contrast, Linux has never released the next version of the cover does not cover cover. This is also one of the open source nature, is always the option upcoming open to the public (and not only in a site),
mbt shoes coupon 2010 贱语大全每条都是亮点, the time limit is always clear. Each user can know exactly when to add any one version of which features in all versions of Linux, in the fully open state. Precisely because of this, Linux is little release of advertising overwhelming, but with Microsoft's different is that you never heard here in the Linux If you go FedoraProject Wiki, you can see all the proposals and the next version of the feature has been accepted; you can see the whole development process: 02/03/09 post a alpharelease, 03/24/09, release a beta release, eventually published in the 05/26/09, time is very clear and in most cases release was very standard.
9, performance comparison
Let us, and by comparing the Windows 7 under Fedora 11 to compare with the Linux operating system Windows performance between:
* Windows 7: Like OS X,
paul smith shirts sale, Doc, multi-touch screen (multi-touch),
nike vomero 5, much like GoogleEarth map application, Hyper-Visor virtualization, location-aware (location-aware) applications, User AccessControl upgrade, remove the Sidebar.
* Fedora 11:20 seconds of boot time, btrfs file system, better support for C, Cups PolicyKit integration, DNSSecurity (DNS SECurity), ext4 default document systems, integrated fingerprint reader, IBUS input method to replace SCIM, GNOME 2.26, KDE 4.2, including Windows cross-compiler (Windows cross-compiler).
If you carefully compare their characteristics, you will easily find that no one makes you impressive. But to know the characteristics of Fedora11 is a great operating system has been increased, but Windows7 times in a comparison of the characteristics of OS on the increase. And Microsoft has repeatedly said that the huge increase (multi-touch), and no increase in the true sense of the operating system.
10, before the hardware requirements
Microsoft has not only claimed that the public, Windows7 will be running Vista can run on any hardware, even on lower hardware requirements than the latter. Lower than Vista? Is overrea
ching? Let's look, Windows7 will miss the netbook market, since the XP after the stage of his
tory, netbook the market is completely occupied by Linux. Because netbook not big enough power to support the hardware and Windows (unless it is streamlined version of XP), but users have the right to choose how to upgrade hardware to meet the requirements of the operating system. Look Fedora10, the most streamlined version of its hardware requirements, hardware 90 is simply to meet operational requirements.
sum up, do you think the public condemnation has been pronounced a failure of Microsoft, or Microsoft Windows 7 will be rescued from mudflats Vista out?
nike vomero 5 Ten reasons Linux will eventually wi
Hybrid Mode
