wind max shoes Parole afterward 25 years of impris

from the West Side Court ruling ashore the case can be discerned, water and electricity in the Second Board in tribunal, refused to acknowledge the receipt of 700,000 yuan of the buy cost. Court based Wuji Meng petition, Tongzhou District, from Agricultural Bank branch and obtain a January 21, 1985 Waldorf trade clothes enterprise storehouse to disburse workmen check a transfer of $ 0.7 million,air max shoes, and remove the present account correction sheet, list page records in 1985 January 22, bank accounts from China are trading storage designated to work 700,000 yuan on the entire. The authenticity of the testify, the Second Board of Water has not objection,gel nimbus, yet said the certify does not prove that the Second Board of Water received 70 million, and the circumstance has been a constraint.
Today dilemma bear
have led to his brisk


Wuji Meng believes that he is to be the Second Board of the false water break, guiding to the court that he did not supply it, and Lan-Ying Wang contract is fraud.
statute of limitations as a converge of argument

1985 年 1 26, Wuji Meng and Lan-Ying Wang signed a purchasing contract, if alternatively not to perform the contract capacity? 20 years after the January 18, 2005, Wu Jimeng West Side Court to document a lawsuit claiming that China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering Bureau of the second return of 700,000 yuan TV immediate payout, and pay amuse.
suing can stimulate retrial

Wuji Meng as an individual, whether due to Chinese trade warehouses are entities when the plaintiff?
complain qualifications?



. testimony that Chinese are warehouses of credit and debt handle along the Wuji Meng individuals themselves. In addition, the Zhangjiawan livestock into the town of Fort Tunxiang government certify that Zhang and Lee for the cardinal managers of the gathering that year, his testimony is true.
after losing the second trial, the Second Board of Water beg, the council uphold the original statement, joined 9 new evidence. In the complaint paperback, the council also said Wuji Meng ambition be based on this,17岁女孩称遭同学扒光上身拍视频, accusing his prison sentence 20 years ago, the two courts and referees production six miscarriages of justice, and thus require state compensation for his 20 years of a colossal economic losses.


■ verdict two opposite
sued the water in addition to the Second Board to regain the purchase price 25 years ago, the Wuji Meng Xuanwu Branch Industrial and Commercial Bank also sued to require the bank to restore all trade warehouse in China ICBC Xuanwu Branch of China Southern Cherry Orchard account the status quo. However, the same plaintiff in either cases, the court was very assorted with a qualification.




2004, the Wuji Meng was released for medical manipulation due to serious illness after creature released on parole last year. Wu Jimeng no property, his sojourn in the 72-year-old brother by home, two aged folk living in the Xuanwu District Hutong, a pigment Wei has 16 residents in the tenements. They house a total of 14 square meters, except two beds and a table, several boxes, the maximum expensive estates is an old refrigerator.
Wuji Meng said, while the Chinese are trading warehouse Xuanwu branch opened in the bank account is, in order to fulfill the 1000 TV and Lan-Ying Wang purchasing contracts, He built the company belongs to Beijing two stores 59 million greenbacks for ordering TV 500. After the store absent from deserving to, again retreated to the Xuanwu branch of the money account. In addition, he returned several times Lan-Ying Wang of $ 1.2 million,nike shox, also from the Xuanwu branch of account expenditures.
reselling TV Rexia calamity



an array contract, admitted to trade in China are fatigue services to the company warehouse order 660 Hitachi color TV sets, the aggregate price of 70 million, distribution time is February 15. Contract the same day, Chinese trade warehouses have issued 70 million transfer to the labor service company check, the next daytime, which maneuvers to labor service company.
case the whole anecdote

If convicted, 25 years antecedent, fraud can not reverse the verdict, we can only Wuji Meng's identity is defined as a parolee. And May 27 next year after the expiration of his sentence, their identity can only be unlocked from prison staff.



I am not qualified in the hospital report said, which is arrange truth?
2006 December retrial in the Court to make decrees. In its ruling, said the hospital, Wu Jimeng medicinal parole in 1991, 1993, off the tube, without going out,atmosphere jordan sneakers 图文：香港户外展出巨型卡通人物雕, was occupied in July 2001, just days sentence changed to May 2011. The hospital that the law does not prohibit inmates enjoy and exercise of civil rights, the case two years law of limitations has expired, the hospital withdrew the original Final Judgement, to discharge Wuji Meng's claim.


stay in Wuji Meng memory, whatever, are 25 years of He kept know next to nothing of the reform and beginning up,asics gel trainer 研究生酒后抢劫700元获刑三年, he carved pen, drawing Painting, plaster to do, including work experience to make money. goods are in short supply, he began act TV trading affair, and fraud, began beneath the TV affair.




in the hospital at the hearing that Lee, Zhang and others as individuals, to prove the original Waldorf warehouse ownership claims and debts to prove strong enough. Although Zhangjiawan town government issued proof, but Wu Jimeng the source of evidence is not clear, and the town government is not a witness to the truth that year. Hospital in April ruled that the Wu Jimeng not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims with the Waldorf warehouse straight interest between debt, not eligibility for the plaintiff, and rejected the prosecution.
the only nice newspaper is that Wuji Meng, ahead and after four civil judgments, the Court finds that utilities are the Second Board received payment, as the Second Board, said water and electricity to the goods, there is no sufficient evidence to patronize.
Wuji Meng's brother, divorced because numerous years, living alone. In 2004, he took only 900 yuan Shi Hai wages, tin immediately obtain $ 2000. Wu Jimeng of $ 470 per month subsistence allowances and age old benefits of $ 200 a month apt purchase a lot of medication, nought left.



twice a retrial, playing a five-year lawsuit, the West Side Court, 1 hospital, the Higher Court have recognized me as the plaintiff's main qualification is no problem, I told bank, a court in what you found my main qualification is inappropriate ?


■ complain only to find out where the money goes
hydropower Second Board denied having received 700 000
Wuji Meng said the contract, the labor service company was not to take a small part of the Hitachi color TV and a large number of semiconductors to the contract, he refused receipt. Since then, he again urged the company to fulfill the contract labor services, but has been evasive, led him to the Lan-Ying Wang can not supply. Until June 26, 1985 was arrested, the labor service company did not fulfill the contract. In addition, the Wuji Meng was the review period, the Second Board of hydropower former vice chancellor Zhang Zhiqiang, labor service companies also issue a certificate to the judiciary to say
five-year civil statute of limitations on the card in, Wuji Meng has not only failed to recover the purchase price 25 years ago, but spent twenty thousand yuan of costs.
Nakasu statute fixed in Beijing for the Wuji Meng Tak Wah to invest free valid aid in criminal cases. Lawyers to the Supreme Court on the application said, in addition to the Second Board of Water and ordered 660 sets of TV appearance sources, in order to vouch the fulfillment of purchasing contracts, Wuji Meng and two construction companies affiliated with Beijing TV store ordered 500 units. In addition, Wu Jimeng cancel the contract in consultation and Lan-Ying Wang, the first return Jimen trade warehouse 500,000 lend, and then returned to Lan-Ying Wang $ 1.2 million owed money all back together, does not constitute fraud.
on May 24 this year, the city court in the High Court order a retrial Wu Jimeng sued the Bureau of Water two case sentencing. A ruling in the Court in the retrial proceedings devoted to Wu Jimeng main qualification. According to the same case with the Industrial and Commercial Bank sued the evidence,mens mbt shoes clearance, the hospital that the Chinese are trading warehouse formerly collective corporations, Wuji Meng and warehouse contract signed among Wuji Meng expressly agreed by the self-financing, operating independently, detach accounting, self- . Therefore, Wu Jimeng have warehouses in China during the contract the right to possess property, income, and rights of deed. Chinese interests have been infringed warehouse that Wuji Meng's rights have been infringed, the Wuji Meng qualified with the subject of proceedings. Li Nana text and photo

20 years after the begin,

and this is precisely the 68-year-old can not adopt. He stood in the hot Xiaoping room, excitedly waving to him for providing legal aid lawyer said: p> Today, Beijing law firm in Germany and Nakasu, as Wuji Meng agent,air max 95 women, submit an application to the Supreme Court to necessitate that happened 25 years ago in a criminal case for retrial.
cases of dispute
1989 March, Beijing Intermediate People's Court of Final Appeal ruling upheld, Wu Jimeng committing fraud and deception, was sentenced to 15 years, guilty of assumption and sentenced to four years, judged to appliance 18 years in jail .

reporter called the Second Board of utilities, make interviews and Wu Jimeng case the council of the relevant circumstances. As of reception time, the council did not answer to interview requests.
the Beijing Intermediate Court is not credible to mention hydropower two innings, the second example upheld the premier instance verdict.



account in order to identify whether capital flows and money Wu Jimeng out of jail, went to Xuanwu branch, that the account has been canceled. In March 2009, Wu Jimeng consultation that, to reinstate the status quo is the bank account the responsibilities and obligations. So he sued the bank to the Xuanwu branch court, demanding the reinstatement of Chinese trade warehouses accounts are intact.
question
Wu Jimeng questioned. In addition, the statute of limitations, he has to generate evidence to prove his serious illness in prison, life was nearly gone, after medical treatment in 1991, a hidden treatment to the field, only saved lives, simply can not exercise their rights . In the Wuji Meng file a grumble to the Beijing High Court, the City City High Court command in the Court for retrial. City in the hospital in May this year to make retrial verdict, a current addition to the original determination re-trial ruling on the Second Board of Water retrial time as a clerical mistake, the hospital still rejected the Wuji Meng's claim.

■ with a plaintiff to sue the company on the line, told banks not
him in the end there is no

Pinggu district court reporters to way the Wuji Meng fraud files. Pinggu Court of First Instance ruling and the Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court of Final Appeal verdict that the culprit, January 26, 1985, Wu Jimeng not have the ability to perform the contract in the case, simulated to have a lot of TV blot, and Huadu Trade warehouse in the appoint of, and Lan-Ying Wang signed a contract for purchasing 1,000 TV. Lan-Ying Wang from trade warehouses, Haidian District Jimen obtain a blank check and Trading Corporation from Pinggu Jingyue obtain a blank check, delivered to the Wuji Meng. Wu Jimeng zoned Items 90 million and 800 thousand yuan to China have trade warehouse accounts. Guangdong Trading Corporation in Beijing to detect deception, there were several to Wuji Meng, Lan-Ying Wang to query for money, Wuji Meng was compelled to repay part of the purchase price. Deception unit criticized later Wuji Meng on June 26, 1985 was collared and brought to justice.
water in the West Side Court of First Instance found the Second Board received 70 yuan loan, and ordered the refund of the purchase price and interest payments, hydropower Second Board of Appeal. During the second trial, the Second Board, also understood as hydropower, Zhang Zhiqiang,asics whizzer lo, the labor service company in the name of city from the west to the Wuji Meng electronics store to buy a color TV and 55 million yuan semiconductor, delivered to the Wuji Meng, Wu Jimeng also fraudulently transfer money from the labor service company 48 million, of $ 0.7 million whether the net Wuji Meng, Wu Jimeng obtaining water two innings 33 million yuan.


■ The court base not qualified to sue