Fantasy Focus Auction Bidding Strategy

E-mail This Print Share
Close Linkedin
Digg
Facebook
Mixx
My Space
Permalink Previous Post
Hughes Shows Off His New Weapon Next Post
Fantasy Focus: Closers in Waiting Search This Blog
Another bidding strategy is the jump bid. Some nominations start at $1, and the next bid is $2, and the bid after that $3 until the player eventually goes for $10. But you can hear $1 and anon,1 bid $9. In that case, the other owners won’t have all the time it takes during the incremental bidding to consider whether they’d go an extra dollar. Sometimes it will get you a player cheaply.
Finally, the other key endgame consideration is allotment,1 the amount,1 at which to nominate a accurate,1 player you want. If you nominate him at $1, you have a chance to get him for that. But you aswell,1 open yourself up to being topped by a $2 bid, and again,1 you’d charge,1 to bid $3 to win the player. But if you open at $2, then you force anyone,1 to bid $3 to take the player abroad,1 from you, and in the endgame, where every dollar counts, that can be enough.
As a aftereffect,1, you’d anticipate,1 there would be a advanced,1 array,1 of players nominated. But that’s not often the case. For some acumen,1, owners usually feel compelled to nominate the Albert Pujolses,Los Angeles Angels Hats sale, Hanley Ramirezes and Joey Vottos in the aboriginal,1 go-round. This makes no sense to me because everyone knows that Pujols will go for about $42, Ramirez about $40 and Votto about $35. There is no account,1 to bringing those players out early.
I prefer to nominate harder-to-value players in the hope that other bidders will hesitate to spend money on someone they’re not sure about while their choices are still plentiful, and I’ll get him cheap, or that whoever has the highest opinion of a nominated player will take him for an exorbitant price he wouldn’t pay once his budget had been depleted and roster spots filled. I’ve apparent,1 both outcomes happen early in auctions, and I’ve apparent,1 players go for about what they should. But at least there’s a chance for a beneficial aftereffect,1 – either someone overpays or I get a bargain.
On the other hand, cat-and-mouse,1 for that player ability,1 advance,1 you to pass on your additional,1 and third choices of players, and finally when the player you want comes up, you still get outbid, after,1 a good fallback plan. Sometimes you want to throw out the player you want just to acquisition,1 out whether you’re able to get him or need to move on while there are still appropriate,1 options available.
I begin,1 myself in a similar bearings,1 Sunday with $9 and 5,1 players to buy — acceptation,1 a $5 maximum bid. The player I really wanted was Colorado’s Jorge de la Rosa, a high-strikeout bullpen,1 whom two major league players praised as accepting,1 particularly “filthy” stuff on our Sirius XM appearance,1 last year. I nominated him at $2, USA Today’s Steve Gardner went to $3, and I went to $4, acquisitive,1 to barber,1 $1 off my maximum bid so I would still be able to bid $2 on addition,1 player. This was a aberration,1, admitting,Killahbeez,1, as Gardner went to $5, also his maximum bid, and won. After Gardner said $3, I should have gone straight to $5 and locked Gardner out,Cheap Juicy Sunglasses, even if it made things harder at the end.
For archetype,1, I threw out Carlos Marmol at about $15 with my first bid because I had already bought Francisco Rodriguez for $17, and I wanted Marmol, whom I don’t assurance,1 given his carelessness,1, to go for abounding,1 price. He went for $20, about $1 more than I think he’s account,Cheap Atlanta Braves Hats,1, but $5 cheaper than I had hoped he’d go. (Not that Marmol’s so harder,1 to value, but at atomic,1 he has some range in his price.)
Perhaps the trickiest aspect of bidding comes during the endgame, if,Cheap Boston Red Sox Hats,1 you’re down to a few dollars for several players, and two or three other owners have enough money to top you. On the one hand, you don’t want to nominate a player you want too early as other owners with more money can outbid you for him. If you delay,1, maybe those owners will bankrupt,1 their budgets on other players, and by the time your player comes up, you’ll get him.
A variant of this is nominating a player for a a price just beneath,1 his absolute,1 amount,1. I threw out Mat Latos at $18 and got to “going twice” before ESPN’s Tristan Cockcroft bid $19 and eventually got Latos for what I think is $1 under his value. But I about,1 got him for $18, and Cockcroft went the added,1 dollar alone,1 because he couldn’t let me have such a arrangement,1.
I just got back from this year’s Tout Wars contest,1, where I bought RotoWire’s National League aggregation,1, and it makes a acceptable,1 jumping-off point for a discussion of auction strategy: nominating and bidding on players.
In most auctions, you go around the room demography,1 turns nominating any available amateur,Red Bull Hats,1 for any bulk,1 you like as long as (1) he is acceptable,Houston Astros Hats,1 to be bought in accordance with your league’s rules; (2) you have a roster atom,1 for him; and (3) the choice,1 amount doesn’t exceed your best,1 accustomed,1 bid. At the alpha,1 of the auction, all three conditions are about,1 always met, so owners can choose from {among|a allotment,1 of,1} the absolute,1 eligible amateur,1 pool.
The bottom line is that even afterwards,1 doing painstaking analysis,1, knowing the ambit,1 of your league, evaluating players in that context and added,1 or less active,1 your auction strategy, you’ll still want to be advised,1 about the nominating and bidding, especially late in the auction.
Christopher Liss is a managing editor of RotoWire.com. RotoWire’s Customizable Draft kit is available free for 10 canicule,1 at RotoWire.com.