Thoughts later GoogleI O

GoogleI / O thoughts after
highlights excerpts:
1, now thatApple and Google's full competition
2, Apple have the advantage - the user experience, industrial design, consistency. Google - Cloud Computing, diversity and openness.
3, Apple now faces the challenge that they had not shown that they can get rid of USB, turned to the clouds. Wireless synchronization, backup and update the system needs some (Apple's MobileMe, although the cloud, but the high charges,GHD Blue Styler, it is said to be free)
4, the biggest loser this week to the number of Microsoft, and they even had no chance to compete
5, merely Microsoft do? They did not. Lack of charming products, inert sales and a shrinking group of users;
6, Nokia's sales volume is ten times the Apple, but Apple still higher than the Nokia big profits.
7, Gartner reported, Windows Mobile smartphone sales in the global market share was only 6.8%. A year ago, or 10.2% of the (report also said that, iPhone has a market share of 15.2%, while the Android 9.6%).
8, at the Google I / O keynote, they were not even mentioned even once! Indeed little chance is gone.

----- The emulating are newspaper reports -----
News source: DARING FIREBALL
This is a John Gruber by May 22, 2010 published in his personal blog DARING FIREBALL the story. Detailed thinking of the Google I / O afterward, Apple, Google and Microsoft contend in the platform's character changes. - Ilizc
Google I / O after, iPhone and Android emulation seems less obvious, but now thatApple and Google's overall championship. This is a majestic old-fashioned but competitive. We all like to watch this intense, even drastic emulation, and we consumers will be the final beneficiaries of this competition. Competition, enhance innovation, while innovation is the new technology, new technology sources. It is because of innovation, a variety of intelligent machines with new features continue to appear in recent years. Like previous history of the competition as people memorize,GHD Kiss Styler, Apple and Google both do not hold every other's essence strengths are, and they both try to use their kernel strengths to define this new market.
Apple have the advantage of what is it? - User experience, industrial devise, consistency. Google? - Cloud Computing, diversity and openness.
in Froyo many new features, most people feel is perhaps interesting to Google in the I / O keynote address shown on the Here is an sample of the use of this API: You can use PC's browser in the Android Marketplace to purchase an application (anthems, or other), then prefer one of them related with your account Android product, you will must purchase something transmitted through the wireless network directly to your Android products.
Similarly, the same way you can use your current computer's browser to the address on the wireless network to your Android,GHD Rare Gift Set, if a web page, this page will open on Android's browser, if it is a Google Maps the URL, the interlock will chart through the Android application opens.
data backup and data recovery in this regard, iPhone has the absolute advantage of Android, which purchased a new iPhone or upgrading a new system, you can use iTunes on the PC to re-sync, before you bought applications or data ambition be restored (3GS recently upgraded to OS 4 betas, I base that even before the open on the page MobileSafari was restored) Android does not have what appearance of feature, design, after a system, Android, and there is no provides a way for users to return data, Google is now trying to amplify the application of cloud-based backup calculator to compensate for this deficiency. This reach is feasible: Android to buy a new product, log in to your Google account, your microcomputer before the existence of cloud applications and data can be sent to the wireless web on your Android.
currently not on Google Android, alike to the iPad such products, but we clearly know thatsimilar products will presently be listed. As I said in My iPad review as, iPad most strange experience for you when you type out the box when they feel: the iPad when you first bring an end to ... of the box, the first thing you to do is use the USB wire to join to your Mac or PC, then synchronize with iTunes. iPad in this area too many favor the iPhone. IPad USB is the only proficient to transfer music, video and email account way. If you do not use the words of MobileMe, your contacts and almanac only via this way. In common, folk feel very behind in this way. This can not assist but think that iPad is not a separate product, favor a baby still need their parents to catch on the same. Then, relatively speaking, he is more like a young, not a youth child, it is seen to be independent of ability, and people calculate he should himself growing.
we can apparently watch the iPhone OS and Android are guiding the future of post-PC era, I said PC is the Mac and Windows both. Simple is the vantage of this mobile device, but likewise thought that a PC tin do many entities they can not do, iPhone OS depends on the PC, iTunes and the USB to make up for this deficiency. The Android is dependent on the cloud. Dependent on the PC to transfer data after the truth should not be something PC epoch. The challenges currently facing Apple is that they have not shown that they can get rid of USB, turning the clouds. Wireless synchronization, backup and update the system needs some Perhaps not a become this week to the number of Microsoft's largest losers, and they even had no contingency to compete. RIM appears to be very mighty, because Blackberrys in the U.S. smartphone mall continues to keep the sales title. But Microsoft do? They did not. Lack of attractive products, sluggish sales and a shrinking group of users. Microsoft changed the fewest is taken for granted. Google in the I / O keynote address at the tit for tat with the iPhone, but they are extra of a possession of the Microsoft native market. Apple and RIM's tactics is to internalize the hardware and software. And Google is playing with Microsoft's tactics - to numerous manufacturer's licensed their evolution platform. Microsoft is not the biggest problem facing the market can not exist 2 authorized platform, but Microsoft's success is based on if their utter control platform for the market.
is ideal, Apple in the future can hold about 20-25% market share. In PC sales accounted for only 5% of global PC sales, but its brought great profits. The cause is very uncomplicated, because all Apple products are condensed in the medial and high-end market. In today's mobile phone market, all the phones, not just smartphones, Nokia's sales volume is ten times the Apple, but Apple still higher than the Nokia big profits. If Microsoft holds in the mobile platform is very small, they can not survive. Their licensing model is based on the amount of - relatively low price multiplied by a colossal profit. 400-600 dollars they are not selling phones, they are just 8-15 in which the U.S. system to acquire licensing fares. But Google allows workers and contractors to use Android system for free, Google not only has an advantage in the license price, and in Windows Phone 7 came out, Android has accumulated two years of the competitiveness and market share.
three years ago, when the recently launched iPhone, Steve Ballmer said in an interview on America Today's David Lieberman said: iPhone can not get many market share. That chance. It is a 500 dollars worth of products and government perquisite, which may be can bring them big profits, but if you see at that 1.3 billion mobile phones creature sold, I'd preferably have 60% or 80% of the market and do not the 2% or 3% market share, even now it brings the profit objective. And that tiny market share, Apple will get it. Steve Ballmer is not only underestimated the iPhone, but also overestimate their own Windows Mobile. Three years ago he said was 60%, 70% or even 80% market share, this week, Gartner reported, Windows Mobile smartphone sales in the universal market share was only 6.8%. A year ago, or 10.2% of the (report also said that, iPhone has a market share of 15.2%,GHD Hair, meantime the Android 9.6%). Microsoft can not compete on amount with the Android, but can transform increasingly obvious that, Microsoft in traits and user experience is also very difficult to arrest up on the Android. In Google I / O keynote, they were not even mentioned even once! Indeed tiny chance is worked.
http://daringfireball.net/2010/05/post_io_thoughts
Post-I / O Thoughts
Saturday,GHD Gold Classic, 22 May 2010
Post-Google I / O, there's not much room left to see iPhone-vs.-Android as anything additional than an all-out combat. What we've got here is a nice old-fashioned epic rivalry.
It's exciting, vicious, fun to watch, and afterward should prove to be wonderful news for users. Competition pedals innovation and innovation heaves the bar for everybody. And the bar, for smartphones, is rising rapidly.
Like whichever magnificent competition, there are bold distinctions among the two competitors. Apple and Google are jostling to shift the approximation between the two platforms to their very another strengths. Apple's strengths: user experience, design, consistency. Google's strengths: the cloud, kind, permissiveness.
The most interesting upcoming Android feature that Google demoed at I / O is a
■ Buy an app (just aboutng,GHD Pure Styler, or anything) from the Android Marketplace using a PC web browser, choose one of your Android devices, and the item you just purchased will be pushed directly to that device over the air.
■ Take the new URL from your PC web browser and move it to your device, over the air. If it's a web sheet, it'll open in the Android web browser; if it's a Google Maps URL, it'll open in the Android Maps app.
One zone where the iPhone has been far along of Android is in terms of backing up and restoring data. Buy a new iPhone, alternatively install a important OS update, and when you re-sync with iTunes on your desktop, always your apps and data are re-installed. (After upgrading my 3GS to the iPhone OS 4 developer betas recently, I noticed that even the network pages I'd left open in MobileSafari were restored.)
Android doesn't have that. Upgrade apt a fashionable Android apparatus, and there is no path apt transmit your file from the antique device apt the new one. Google is upping the ante aboard the iPhone here, whereas, by joining smoke -based data backup as Android applications. The way it ought work: obtain a new Android device, record in with your Google account, and your apps and data are reinstated to the device, over the ventilation.
Android has nothing today that competes with the iPad. But we all know Android-based iPad-like pills are certainly coming.1 As I noted in my iPad review, the oddest part of the iPad experience is what happens when you first take it out of the box:
One thing that is very iPhone-like about iPad is that when you first take it out of the box, it wants to be plugged into your Mac or PC through USB and sync with iTunes. In some ways, that's understandable. USB syncing is how you load your iPad with music and videos and transfer over material like your email accounts, and, if you're not using MobileMe, your contacts and calendars. But, on the whole, it feels retrograde. It creates an impression that the iPad does not stand on its own. It's a child that still needs a parent. But it's not a young child. It's more like a teenager. It's near. So close that it feels like it ought to be able to stand on its own .
It's obvious that iPhone OS and Android devices are paving the way to a post-PC future, where by that they can't do anything a PC can. iPhone OS devices depend upon a PC, iTunes, and USB syncing to manage this gap. Android devices depend upon waiters in the cloud.
Relying above a PC is ipso facto not and system updates absence to be someone that
'No Chance'
The huge loser this week, though, was Microsoft. They're simply not even part of the game. RIM looms great, for BlackBerrys persist to dynasty as the best-selling smartphones in the US But Microsoft? They've got naught. No amusing devices, languid bargains, and a dwindling consumer found. Microsoft's irrelevance is taken for allowed.
Google's competitive converge on the iPhone at I / O was intense and scathing. But it's Microsoft's luncheon they're eating. Apple's and RIM's game is selling the integrated whole - their own devices, fleeing their own software. Google is playing Microsoft's game - licensing a platform to many device makers.
The big problem for Microsoft is not that there isn't, in theory, chamber for more than one licensed mobile platform, but rather that Microsoft's model hinges upon monopoly-sized market share. Apple could positively thrive with a long-term mobile market share of, mention, 20-25 percent. In the PC industry, Apple generates an outsized share of the profits despite selling only 5 percent of the aggregate units international, because all of Apple's PCs are in the medium and high price scope of the market. In the phone industry today - all mobile phones, not just smartphones - Nokia sells more than 10 times as many units as Apple, but Apple generates more profit.
Microsoft can't afford for its mobile platform to account for fair a sliver of the industry's unit sales. Their copyrighting model is all approximately volume - cheap per-unit profits multiplied by an enormous digit of units. They're not selling $ 400-600 calls, they're selling $ 8-15 licenses for one OS.
But Google lets carriers and handset makers license Android for free. And not merely has Google mow the bottom out of the market price-wise, at a time Windows Phone 7 phones actually come to market, Android will have two complete years of impetus and market share backward it.
Three years ago, just before the original iPhone boated, here's what Steve Ballmer said in an interview with USA Today's David Lieberman:
sold, I'd choose to have our software in 60 percent or 70 percent or 80 percent of them, than I would to have 2 percent or 3 percent, which is what Apple might get.
Not only was he bad about the iPhone, but he was even more erroneous about Windows Mobile. Three years ago Ballmer was talking about 60, 70, 80 percent market share. This week, Gartner reported that Windows Mobile has dropped to 6.8 percent market share in worldwide smartphone sales, down dramatically from 10.2 percent a year ago. (The same report puts iPhone OS at 15.2 percent, and Android at 9.6.)
Microsoft can't undercut Android on price, and it seems increasingly unlikely that they can knock Android in terms of features or experience. They didn't justification even a passing reference from Google at I / O. No chance, naturally.

-------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
1.Although there's still no chaste Android-based equivalent to the iPod Touch. ↩

achat nike