Following two-plus many years of development, Windows seven is virtually done. Microsoft officials have been thanking (although to not some testers; liking — more on that later) the millions who downloaded the various test builds and provided feedback for their help in building the product.However, Microsoft;s brass isn;t thanking publicly an inner circle of about 40 or so individuals who actually were the “real” Windows seven testers. This group of hand-picked individuals are the ones on whom the Windows team seemed to count for a lot of the feedback about the various test builds of Windows seven as it made its way through the advancement pipeline.These so-called Test Pilots saw more Windows seven builds than the rest of the testing community,
Links London Letter, and they usually saw them earlier. Microsoft officials were especially attuned to their feedback when tweaking the product. In spite of the Windows client team;s repeated insistence that “telemetry,
Links Of London Online, telemetry, telemetry!” means Windows seven is a customer-driven release, some believe that the Test Pilots and Microsoft;s corporate Technology Adoption Program (TAP) testers were the only external entities that had a great deal of any real impact on the final Windows seven product.(Update: For the record, the Windows client team insists that this perception is untrue and that testers; feedback made a difference in Windows seven. See the Engineering 7 blog posts here, here and here for more on Microsoft;s defense of its testing policies.)None of the Test Pilots I contacted was willing to be identified by name. Some refused to acknowledge that they were Pilots or knew about the Pilot program, fearing the wrath of the Windows client management. (You can;t blame them; they want to be part of the Windows 8 inner circle, too.)Microsoft;s decision to create this “elite” group has created considerable animosity among other Windows testers. While the majority of the unwashed masses of public testers don;t assume their suggestions and bug finds will matter substantially in terms of Windows; final design, Microsoft;s “technical beta testers” do.Many of technical beta testers put a lot of time and energy into unearthing and documenting bugs and passing them on to Microsoft. And a number of them were angry that they were provided with only two official Windows seven test builds from Microsoft over the past three decades — and that all they are getting for their work on Windows 7 is a belated “we gave you a chance to get Win seven at 50 percent off” head-pat and no free copy of the final product.Up until the start of the Windows 7 development cycle,
Cheap Thomas Sabo Charms, the technical beta testers were treated as more integral to the creation of Windows. Testers felt like their feedback and guidance mattered and that they were kept in the loop more about what was coming when. Betas of Windows felt more like malleable builds that were subject to user-contributed changes — unlike the case with Windows seven,
Thomas Sabo Onlineshop, which a number of testers felt was practically carried out by the time it hit its pre-beta milestone builds, let alone the first beta.In short,
Links London Letter, the Windows seven beta testing process was now a lot like Microsoft Office;s, with the first test build seeming more like a final version of the product than something that Microsoft actually expected to be open to tester feedback. (Given the number of former Office managers and execs who now are leading the Windows team, that change isn;t too surprising.)Was the Windows 7 testing experience any different/better for the Test Pilots?One Test Pilot with whom I spoke said that while the pilots received new builds of Windows 7 every month or so, they weren;t privy to a great deal information, either.[More from the Test Pilots] –>