Tiffany Jewelry The government

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 27 28 29 30 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 fifteen sixteen 17 eighteen 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Close
Cell
PDF
Problem 4690. Previous Updated: 07/29/2011 My profile: Login or sign up at no cost
Home
News
Business
Opinion
Arts & Ideas
Blogs
Multimedia


Simon Johnson,Tiffany Jewelry Outlet, a former chief economist of the IMF, is a professor at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics,Pandora Jewellery Nz, and co-author, with James Kwak, of “13 Bankers.” © Project Syndicate
');
document.write('
Leading U.S. lawmakers are determined to provoke a showdown with the  administration of President Barack Obama over the federal government’s debt ceiling. Ordinarily, you might expect House Republicans to blink at this stage of the negotiations, but there is a hard-line minority that actually appears to think that defaulting on government debt would not be a bad thing.

These representatives — with whom I’ve interacted at three congressional hearings recently — are convinced that the U.S. federal government is too big relative to the economy and that drastic measures are needed to bring it under control. Depending on your assessment of Tea Party strength on Capitol Hill, at least a partial debt default does not seem as implausible as it did in the past — and recent warnings from ratings agencies reflect this heightened risk.

But the consequences of any default would, ironically, actually increase the size of government relative to the U.S. economy — the quite outcome that Republican intransigents claim to be trying to avoid.

The reason is simple: A government default would destroy the credit system as we know it. The fundamental benchmark interest rates in modern financial markets are the “risk-free” rates on government bonds. Removing this pillar of the system — or creating a high degree of risk around U.S. Treasuries — would disrupt many private contracts and all kinds of transactions.

In addition, many people and firms hold their “rainy day money” in the form of U.S. Treasuries. The money market funds that are perceived to be the safest, for example, are those that hold only U.S. government debt. If the government defaults, however, all of them will “break the buck,Pandora Bijoux,” meaning that they will be unable to maintain the principal value of the money that has been placed with them.

The result would be capital flight — but to where? Many banks would have a similar problem: A collapse in U.S.Treasury prices would destroy their balance sheets.

There is no company in the United States that would not be affected by a government default — and no bank or other financial institution that could provide a secure haven for savings. There would be a massive run into cash, on an order not seen since the Great Depression, with long lines of people at ATMs and teller windows withdrawing as much as possible.

Private credit, moreover, would disappear from the U.S. economic system, confronting the Federal Reserve with an unpleasant choice. Either it could step in and provide an enormous amount of credit directly to households and firms — much like the old Soviet Union’s central bank — or it could stand by idly while gross domestic product falls twenty percent or 30 percent, a decline that we have seen in modern economies when credit suddenly dries up.

With the private sector in free of charge fall, consumption and investment would decline sharply. The United States’ ability to export would also be undermined because foreign markets would likely be affected. In any case, if export firms cannot get credit, they most likely cannot produce.

The Republicans are right about one thing: A default would cause government spending to contract in real terms. But which would fall more,Tiffany And Co Outlet, government spending or the size of the private sector? The answer is almost certainly the private sector, given its dependence on credit to purchase inputs. Indeed, take the contraction that followed the near-collapse of the financial system in 2008 and multiply it by 10.

The government,Pandora Bracelets, on the other hand, has access to the Federal Reserve and could therefore get its hands on cash to pay wages. With the debt ceiling unchanged, this would require some legal sleight of hand. But the alternative would clearly be a collapse of U.S. national security. Soldiers and border guards have to be paid, the transportation system must operate,Tiffany Sale, and so on.

Issuing money in this situation would almost certainly be inflationary,Pandora Jewelry Canada, but the Federal Reserve might conclude otherwise. After all, the United States has never been in this predicament before, credit is now imploding, and the desperate credit-expansion measures implemented in 2008 proved not to be as bad as the critics feared.

So this is what a U.S. debt default would look like: The private sector would collapse,Pandora Schmuck Günstig abbreviated as UX, unemployment would quickly surpass 20 percent, and,Tiffany Jewelry, while the government would shrink, it would remain the employer of final resort.

The House and Senate Republicans who do not want to raise the debt ceiling are playing with fire. They are advocating a policy that would have dire effects and that would accomplish the opposite of what they claim to want. A default would immediately make the government more, not less, important.

The only law that Congress cannot repeal is the law of unintended consequences.