te (see: ). Funding for RIF increased from $23 million in FY 2001, the last Clinton budget, to $24 and $25 million in FY 2002 and 2003, the first Bush budgets. After 2003, the funding was essentially frozen at $25 million each year.However, in government budget-speak, a freeze is the same as a cut; salaries, administrative expenses and the costs of books have gone up. The need for books, however, has not gone down.Yet I go to expectmore
jordan heels for woman, a site co-developed by his agency to rate federal programs by their effectiveness—and RIF is not listed in the program database!So, the American people don't even know why the White House considers RIF to be ineffective.It's only proper to find out what RIF did wrong
shop shoes uk, and why the White House wants to take it out of the budget. The USA Today article mentions a preference for a merit-based competitive bid, over an automatic grant to RIF, but why
louis vuitton authentic, when a non-profit has done this successfully for 42 years? Is it because they'd prefer not to fund an organization run by a former Clinton appointee? Cronyism has been part of every political administration since there have been politicians. However, RIF's board is a mix of public and private members; more than 140 publishers participate. This is hardly an organization of polityilai：
nike heels for women
Reviewing Dahle Vantage Leverbjy
shop shoes uk|Reviewing Dahle Vantage Leverbsy
Threaded Mode