Microsoft Office Professional 2007 Leopard vs. Vis

Let me attempt this once more.,Microsoft Office Enterprise 2007
Seeing that so various viewers misunderstood my blog publish from earlier this week about my consider on Apple CEO Steve Jobs; keynote,Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise, I;d prefer to try to clarify what I used to be trying to say.
But first, let me say thanks for the lots of fascinating e-mail messages and feedback on the first publish. And unique many thanks for your unsolicited guidance,Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010, which ranged from “find a new career,” to “see a doctor about your time/space problem you seem to have,” to “you should be running a car wash in Frezno.” I have been attempting to respond to all of my e-mail correspondents, but unfortunately numerous of you seem to get using ######## e-mail addresses and names that aren;t your own.
I heard from some interesting corners. I heard from Windows users who think the Mac OS X is far superior to Vista. I heard from Apple users who said they thought Leopard would be a weak Mac OS X release. And I heard from rather a handful of Mac folks who thought Careers; keynote was too much of a rehash from January and was a lame representation of what Apple has coming around the operating system front.
My original post was not an try at a Vista vs. Leopard product review (in response to the reader who said s/he;d contact my managers to make sure this ZDNet reviewer was fired,Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010!). Nor was it a news story. It was my plain, old, biased opinion, as most weblog posts tend to get.
Admittedly, my headline choice (“Leopard looks like … Vista”) for my authentic weblog posting was poor. Numerous folks immediately assumed I was asserting that Leopard — the version of Mac OS X coming this October, which Careers demonstrated at the Worldwide Developers Conference on July 11 — was copied from Vista. And seemingly read no further.
That isn;t what I was saying at all. In fact, I consciously stayed away from the whole “who copied whom” discussion, which has been debated for years now. I had nothing new to observe there and didn;t intend for this blog publish to become a timeline. (I also didn;t expect it to be a forum for Linux users, yet still heard from a reader who told me that I was a fool not to mention Linux, since it was obvious Apple and Microsoft both had stolen their interface ideas from Linux. I;m not kidding.)
Instead, what I used to be trying to ask was whether users out there, especially those who;ve had a chance to play with the closed Leopard betas, believe there are features and functionality in Leopard that will leapfrog what;s available in Vista. I used to be curious because I often hear Apple officials and users assert that Leopard will be light years ahead of Vista as soon as Leopard ships. Yet in the demonstration I saw on Monday, I didn;t see much of anything — other than the beautiful eye candy, as noted by LifeHacker — that seemed to go beyond what Microsoft is doing with Vista.
As I noted in my authentic publish, I am not a Mac user. Please excuse any Mac OS X subsystem names I bungled in my publish; I simply utilised the terms Work opportunities used. For a better use of correct Apple terminology in comparing Leopard to Vista, I;d suggest visitors check out Microsoft Watch;s follow-up post from July 12.)
A variety of visitors said they thought the Top 10 Leopard features list I cited was weak and chose to make Leopard look bad. Just a reminder: This wasn;t my list. This was the list of features that Work chose to highlight.
Yes, I have seen Mac OS X Tiger and, thank you to the kind loan of an iMac from Apple a year ago, had a chance to dabble with it. It wasn;t my cup of tea. I am too set in my Windows ways to switch. (At the same time, I seriously doubt anyone at Microsoft would call me a “Vista fan girl.”.)
At the risk of having my inbox flooded once more with much more love mail and thoughtful career suggestions from all you enthusiastic Mac users out there,Microsoft Office Professional 2007, I;d prefer to re-ask my unique question. What features coming in Leopard do you think will leapfrog Vista? (Not in terms of what they look like, but in terms of what they will do.) I am asking because I want fodder for my next interview with the Windows team and — as so quite a few of you suggested I do — to educate myself.