alter? micro$oft's intention is to rule the market. then it might dictate it really is consumers when they should buy their new items and discard the outdated ones,
Office 2007 Serial, given that the previous ones are being forced into obsolescence. vista was most likely delivered half baked due to the fact m$ made the decision they needed to get compensated once again. and after that again, with all the apparently fully baked windows 7.
i believe aspect of microsoft's technique is pulling the it pros more than to their aspect. get them employed to their goods, ensure it is easy for them.... studying a fresh os like linux is really a soreness as well as a half, much easier to put in a very fraction with the work learning linux requires each time you must 'evolve' with m$. that way you 'spread it out'....
i also comprehend that the marketplace is making it difficult for linux - all individuals drivers troubles, set up criteria etc.
and individuals are likely to dislike change increasingly more as time passes plus they get employed on the way they can be doing issues.
so - i think, sure, you need to move with the time. as well as a great deal of this 'time' is managed by m$,
Office 2007, therefore you will ultimately must leave xp behind (and, btw - you'll find improvements more than xp even in vista,
Microsoft Office 2007, apart from every one of the new irritating functions). but i'd wait around,
Windows 7 Ultimate, perhaps set up a number of computer systems with vista to find out it,
Microsoft Office 2007 Professional, wait around for win7 and after that do the same with it. migrate when you can afford to, but be ready.
and should you truly wanna be independent of m$, try linux out. a few personal computer managing linux, try to integrate them into your firm.
but i do not think anybody is gonna dictate m$ anything at all providing they don't have any serious opposition in the discipline of oss.
r.