Quick Search


Tibetan singing bowl music,sound healing, remove negative energy.

528hz solfreggio music -  Attract Wealth and Abundance, Manifest Money and Increase Luck



 
Your forum announcement here!

  Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Board | Post Free Ads Forum | Free Advertising Forums Directory | Best Free Advertising Methods | Advertising Forums > Post Your Free Ads Here in English for Advertising .Adult and gambling websites NOT accepted. > Small Business Opportunities:

Small Business Opportunities: This section is for posting your free classified ads about different work at home and home based business opportunities. NO PORN ALLOWED!

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-06-2011, 09:00 AM   #1
clarexgzx
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Corpus characterization in e-discovery

In e-discovery (document retrieval for civil litigation), one side has the documents, the other side proposes the query. This creates an information asymmetry; the requesting side cannot view the corpus to decide what keywords to use and what queries to propose, and opportunities for query iteration are limited, expensive, and liable to being contested. What is needed are methods by which the requester can require the responder to characterize the corpus, and guide the requester in constructing queries. These methods need to be reasonable, both in expense and in chance of revealing <a href="http://www.cheapcigarettesonlineoutlet.com"><strong>cheap cigarettes</strong></a> sensitive but case-irrelevant information, otherwise the judge will not agree to force the responder <a href="http://www.cheapcigarettesonlineoutlet.com/marlboro-cigarettes-c-67?zenid=pfc6fv3hdqmictoek14cst57c7"><strong>cigar ettes online</strong></a> to comply with them. A simple but useful method, proposed by Cross and Kerskiek1, is that the responder produce a vocabulary list of their corpus, with term frequency information. Careful analysis of such a frequency vocabulary should uncover unusual terminology, jargon, or abbreviations used in the corpus, as well as more prosaic information, such as variant spellings of keywords. What other corpus characterizations would be useful in informing the requester in their choice of query keywords? And what tools can IR and NLP researchers give lawyers and e-discovery vendors to help them analyze and understand this information? 1. Cross, David. D and Kerksiek, Sanya Sarich, “Using Electronic Search Tools and Search-Methodology Experts in E-Discovery: A Discussion of Recent Case Law and Other <a href="http://www.cheapcigarettesonlineoutlet.com/"><strong>cigarettes coupons online</strong></a> Authorities”. In Michael D. Berman, Courtney Ingraffia Barton, and Paul W. Grimm (ed.) Managing E-Discovery and ESI: From Pre-Litigation Through Trial, American Bar Association, 2011. This entry was posted on Sunday, September 4th, 2011 at 8:28 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:36 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Message Boards | Post Free Ads Forum