|
cheap ghd hair straig pure white | MY ARTICLE POINT
quickly became serious enough to plot a wedding. They had gone so far as to set a date and issue invitations when Tim called. He had repented and wanted to go back in. When Sara told him her ghd limited edition marriage plans, he begged her to change her mind; he wanted to be together with her as before. But Sara refused, saying she didn't want to live like that again. Tim even offered to marry her, but she still said she preferred the other boyfriend. Finally, Tim volunteered to quit drinking if she would only relent. Feeling that under those conditions Tim had the edge, Sara chose to break her engagement, cancel the wedding, retract the invitations, and let Tim go back in with her. Within a month, Tim informed Sara that he didn't reckon he needed to stop his drinking after all; a month later, he had chose that they should "wait and see" before getting married. Two years have since passed; Tim and Sara continue to live together exactly as before. He still drinks, there are still no marriage plans, yet Sara is more devoted to Tim than she ghd mk4 straighteners ever was. She says that being forced to choose taught her that Tim really is number one in her heart. So, after choosing Tim over her other boyfriend, Sar ghd straighteners outlet a became more pleased with him, even though the conditions under which she had made her choice have never been fulfilled. Obviously, horse-race bettors are not alone in their willingness to believe in the correctness of a hard choice, once made. Indeed, we all fool ourselves from time to time in order to keep our thoughts and beliefs consistent with what we have already done or chose. Psychologists have long understood the power of the consistency principle to direct human action. Prominent theorists such as Leon Festinger, Fritz Hieder, and Theodore Newcomb have viewed the desire for consistency as a central motivator of our behavior. But is this tend- 44 / Influence ency to be consistent really strong enough to compel us to do what we ordinarily would not ghd ceramic straighteners want to do? There is no question about it. The drive to be (and look) consistent constitutes a highly potent weapon of social influence, often causing us to act in ways that are clearly contrary to our own best interests. Take, as proof, what happened when psychologist Thomas Moriarty staged thefts on a New York City beach to see if onlookers would risk personal harm to halt the crime. In the study, a research accomplice would place a beach blanket down five feet from the blanket of a randomly chosen individual—the experimental subject. After a couple of minutes on the blanket spent relaxing and listening to music from a portable radio, the accomplice would stand up and leave the <a href="http://www.chanelhandbags-discount.com/dior-totes-c-1_2.html"><strong>dior handbags</strong></a> blanket to stroll down the beach. A few minutes later, a second researcher, pretending to be a thief, would approach, grab the radio, and try to rush away with it. As you might guess, under normal conditions, subjects were very reluctant to place themselves in harm's way by challenging the thief—only four people did so in the twenty times, that the theft was staged. But when the same procedure was tried another twenty times, with a slight twist, the results were drastically different. In these incidents, before taking his stroll, the accomplice would simply question the subject to please "watch my things," which each of them agreed to do. Now, propelled by the rule for consistency, nineteen of the twenty subjects became virtual vigilantes, running after and stopping the thief, demanding an explanation, and often restraining the thief physically or snatching the radio away. To know why consistency is so powerful a motive, i pink ghd t is vital to recognize that in most circumstances consistency is valued and adaptive. Inconsistency is commonly thought to be an undesirable personality trait. The person whose beliefs, words, and deeds don't match may be seen as indecisive, confused, two-faced, or even mentally ill. On the other side, a high degree of consistency is normally associated with personal and intellectual strength. It is at the heart of logic, rationality, stability, and honesty. A quote new ghd 2011 attributed to the fantastic British chemist Michael Faraday suggests the extent to which being consistent is approved—sometimes more than being right. When questioned after a lecture if he meant to imply that a despised academic rival was always incorrect, Faraday glowered at the questioner and answered, "He's not that consistent." Certainly, then, excellent personal consistency is highly valued in our culture. And well it should be. It provides us with a reasonable and ghd iv straighteners gainful orientation to the world. Most of the time we will be better off if our approach to things is well laced with consistency. Without it our lives would be hard, erratic, and disjointed. Robert B. Cialdini Ph.D / 45 But because it is so typically in our best interests to be consistent, we easily fall into the habit of being automatically so, even in situations where it is not the sensible way to be. When it occurs unthinkingly, consistency can be disastrous. Nonetheless, even blind consistency has its attractions. First, like most other forms of automatic responding, it offers a shortcut through the density of modern life. Once we have made up our minds about an issue, stubborn consistency allows us a very appealing luxury: We really don't have to reckon hard about the issue anymore. We don't have to sift through the blizzard of information we encounter every day to identify relevant facts; we don't have to expend the mental energy to weigh the pros and cons; we don't have to make any further tough decisions. Instead, all we have to do when confronted with the issue is to turn on our consistency tape, whirr, and we know just what to believe, say, or do. We need only believe, say, or do whatever is consistent w pink ghd ith our earlier choice. The allure of such a luxury is not to be minimized. It allows us a convenient, relatively effortless, and efficient method for dealing with complex daily environments that make severe demands on our mental energies and capacities. It is not hard to know, then, why automatic consistency is a hard reaction to curb. It offers us a way to evade the rigors of continuing thought. And as Sir Joshua Reynolds noted, "There is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor of thinking." With our consistency tapes operating, then, we can go about our business <a href="http://www.cheap-nikeairmaxshoes.com/nike-air-max-2009-mens-nike-air-max-2009-c-94_98.html"><strong>Nike Air Max 2009 for men</strong></a> happily excused from the toil of having to reckon too much. There is a second, more perverse attraction of mechanical consistency as well. Sometimes it is not the effort of hard, cognitive work that makes us shirk thoughtful activity, but the harsh consequences of that activity. Sometimes it is th ghd iv e cursedly clear and unwelcome set of answers provided by straight thinking that makes us mental slackers. There are certain disturbing things we simply would rather not realize. Because it is a preprogrammed and mindless method of responding, automatic consistency can supply a safe hiding place from those troubling realizations. Sealed within the fortress walls of rigid consistency, we can be impervious to the sieges of reason. One night at an introductory lecture given by the transcendental meditation (TM) program, I witnessed a nice illustration of how people will hide inside the walls of consistency to protect themselves from the troublesome consequences of thought. The lecture itself was presided over by two earnest young men and was designed to recruit new 46 / Influence members into the program. The program claimed it could teach a unique brand of meditation that would allow us to achieve all manner of desirable things, ranging from simple inner peace to the more spectacular abilities to glide and pass through walls at the program's advanced (and more expensive) stages. I had chose to attend the meeting to observe the kind of compliance tactics used in recruitment lectures of this sort and had brought along an interested friend, a university professor whose areas of specialization were statistics and symbolic logic. As the meeting progressed and the lecturers clarified the theory behind TM ghd products , I noticed my logician friend becoming increasingly restless. Looking more and more pained and shifting about constantly in his seat, he was finally unable to resist. When the leaders called for questions at the completion of the lecture, he raised his hand and gently but surely demolished the presentation we had just heard. In less than two minutes, he pointed out precisely where and why the lecturers' complex argument was contradictory, illogical, and unsupportable. The effect on the discussion leaders was devastating. After a confused silence, each attempted a weak answer only to h ghd hair styler alt midway to confer with his partner and finally to admit that my colleague's points were excellent ones "requiring further study." More fascinating to me, though, was the effect upon the rest of the coloured Ghd Hair Straighteners audience. At the end of the question period, the two recruiters were faced with a crush of audience members submitting their seventy-fivedollar down paymen ghd flat iron ts for admission to the TM program. Nudging, shrugging, and chuckling to one another as they took in the payments, the recruiters betrayed signs of giddy bewilderment. After what appeared to have been an embarrassingly clear collapse of their presentation, the meeting had somehow turned into a fantastic success, generating mystifyingly high levels of compliance from the audience. Although more than a bit puzzled, I chalked up the audience response to a failure to know the logic of my colleague's arguments. As it turned out, but, just the reverse was the case. Outside the lecture room after the meeting, we were approached by three members of the audience, each of whom had given a down payment immediately after the lecture. They wanted to know why we had come to the session. We clarified, and we questioned the same question of them. <a href="http://www.cheapstraighteners-sales.com/ghd-iv-black-c-12/ghd-iv-black-p-41"><strong>ghd iv</strong></a> One was an aspiring actor who wanted desperately to succeed at his craft and had come to the meeting to learn if TM would allow him to achieve the necessary self-control to master the art; the recruiters had assured him that it would. The second described
|