observation of pregnant women, extraction of serum, third girl wrote, Wow a bit weird? This is now the 25th Intel Science Chengdu Youth Science Creation Competition judges thesis set the mood at this time. Do not think this is a little of the praise, the subtext is one of the judges are false.
judges said that to help and guide students to complete the thesis is required. But how many students take the work in which not only is ghostwritten, currently no measure,
coach barrett sneakers on sale, therefore, this thesis can not award yesterday, has become an open question.
grade students in three years of observation of pregnant women?
judges do not believe
false papers, Youth Science Creation Competition judges worry is not groundless.
requirements onto come!
why ######## the wind blowing? Experts believe that in the examination Jiafenzhengce are to blame. Originally, Intel Chengdu Youth Science Creation Competition awarded first prize in the junior high school students, the test can add 15 points to enjoy the benefits. In order to win a prize, asked people to the phenomenon of ghost is naturally unable to avoid.
Although the City Board of Education has announced the abolition of the tournament the first prize in the test plus, but the current Department of Education announced early entries have been submitted before. In order to
finished the development of a student on the edge of Wenjiang, the judges shaking his head: the number of Some of which are hard to believe that the judges will be junior high school students can do. For example, from 2007 to 2009, dozens of pregnant women for clinical observation. p> Student:
father to experiment and observation, make their own records
of the article Alan (a pseudonym) walked into the classroom. She met a lot more than other participants to be the problem.
Li did not know some of the issues should not answer. For example, the centrifugal extraction equipment serum What color? The judges did not hide her doubts. / p>
Li told reporters that the experiment does not own, but the data is under the guidance of his father's record. Clinical observation is the father told her: .
parents
The key is, the paper is not my idea? I have a big contribution on the paper? This is our concern at the reply.
that this situation like Alan, how found it? The father to catch the knife? Xiao Li, Or should count as Mike's paper? Currently, there is no such as a ruler-like precision evaluation criteria. The key to how to identify the three judges. The judges present there is no conclusion:
papers such as the Li is not uncommon. Reporters yesterday at the scene saw a lot of paper One pair of study materials for students, their father was a famous Polymer Research Labora
tory University of charge. Under the guidance of his father, the professional standard of papers will naturally not bad. But how much is from their own brains and hands of students, the judges called a question mark on the first heart.
However, many secondary school teachers agree that this trend will disappear in the next year. Reporter Wang Mian