Office 2010 Key Bible Doctrines Affected by Modern

[kegen87247]

Thou hast magnified thy term earlier mentioned all thy identify.
-Psalm 138:2, KJV
Page one of 2
BIBLE DOCTRINES Affected BY Modern-day Variations (1/2)
By Paul L. Freeman

INTRODUCTION

The battle for the Phrase of God is going on nowadays since it often has. The work of your Evil 1 himself has actually been to trigger males to question the Term (Gen. three:1), to corrupt the Word (two Cor. two:17), and to misquote the Term (Luke 4:10,11). There are lots of Modern day Variations within the scene nowadays all claiming for being far more precise or maybe more readable renderings of your Term of God. Nearly all of these variations follow the MINORITY Greek Text though that text exhibits a corruption during. The King James Version was translated through the Majority Greek Text which agrees with about 95% of all obtainable manuscripts. The bulk Greek Text may be traced back again towards the Peshitta (Syriac Version) about one hundred fifty A.D.

Several Christian Colleges and Universities have switched more than for the MINORITY Greek Text (identified as Westcott and Hort or Nestle and Aland) for the classroom even though nonetheless making use of the King James Model in public preaching. Considering that you will find above 5,000 variations amongst the majority and MINORITY texts a problem quickly faces the pupil. The King James Model he brings towards the classroom is subjected to continuous modifying through the teacher who is employing a Greek Text different in the a single the King James Edition was translated from. The pupil is well aware that God didn't inspire two diverse Bibles. He ought to generate a alternative and for that sake of harmony or instructor satisfaction he'll generally accept his King James Edition minus the MINORITY Text corrections because the Word of God. Really should there be an area exactly where agreement can not be attained he's informed to decide about the proper rendering by exercising his spiritual discernment. The educational institutions that are subsequent this double normal will admit that once the King James Version is no extended required for Public Relations they are going to make the whole modify towards the New American Common or even the New Global Version. These two are witnessed to stick to the MINORITY Greek Text.

People that desire to change our King James Edition with new Contemporary Variations are constantly stating that no Bible Doctrines are impacted through the adjustments. One particular college not long ago revealed an write-up by one particular of its' lecturers through which he explained that, "BOTH TEXTS ARE THE Phrase OF GOD." It is difficult to understand how two texts differing in more than five,000 places can both be the Term of God. It only serves to show the absolute desperation within the part with the MINORITY Text champions to defend their indefensible position. The purpose of this volume is to show the modifications made through the MINORITY text and how they affect the Bible Doctrines which Christians have constantly believed. Though I do not consider any alter in the Phrase of God to get unimportant, I have singled out the most glaring examples. A careful reading will show that the Fundamental Doctrines of the Christian faith have been affected a lot of times.

Are we to believe the scholars when they tell us that no important doctrines are affected from the new Modern Variations? It is obvious that they are not correct. What they really mean to say is that when all the modifications have been made the Bible Doctrines are still there somewhere else in the Bible. If you'll find ten verses showing the Virgin Birth of Christ,Office 2010 Key, and they have removed two, there are even now eight remaining to prove the doctrine. That may satisfy them, but the Fundamental believer sees that as a piece by piece destruction with the Word of God.

We would accuse them of taking away from your Term of God. They would accuse us of making use of a Bible which has a lot of additions inserted by overzealous Christian copyists. The issue now becomes quite clear. We must either believe that overzealous heretics have corrupted the original Phrase of God or believe that overzealous believers have added for the original Term of God. I can understand why heretics would wish to corrupt the original Phrase of God, but I cannot believe that Christians would add 1 word towards the Phrase of God which they have been entrusted to copy and pass along. The Spirit of God within Christians would put a holy awe and reverence around the sacred term and guided by that same Spirit they would copy what God had given them. My conclusion is that the new Modern day Variations are based on Greek manuscripts that have been corrupted by heretics who changed the Term of God to agree with their rejection with the Deity of Christ and their Humanism regarding salvation. The Greek Text underlying the King James Version is not filled with additions made by overzealous Christians. It is the Word of God preserved through the Spirit of God and it exalts the Lord Jesus Christ,Office 2010 Standard Key, giving him his correct place and the glory due unto his name.

THE Adjustments IN THEIR Appropriate NEW TESTAMENT ORDER ARE NOW LISTED:



MATTHEW

1:25 "her firstborn" is omitted. That Jesus was her firstborn indicates that Mary and Joseph had ######ual relations after the birth of Jesus and that others were born of her. The omission here seeks to add credence towards the false doctrine with the Roman Catholic Church concerning the perpetual virginity of Mary. The Bible is clear that Jesus had brothers and sisters.

5:22 "without a cause" is removed. In the Sermon about the Mount the Lord warned of judgment for people who were angry with a brother without a cause. Should this alter be accepted everyone that is angry with his brother may be judged. The effect is to bring Jesus into judgment for failing to observe his own words (see Mark 3:5). Such is contrary to your doctrine of your sinlessness of Christ.

6:4, 6, 18 "openly" is out. It is a Bible Doctrine that Christian function done unnoticed for the glory from the Lord will a single day be rewarded openly (Col. 3:four).

6:13 "For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever, Amen" is deleted. This ascription of praise to "Our Father" is found in 491 out of 500 existing manuscripts. This statement was made a century ago by Dean John Burgon.

8:29 "Jesus" is left out. The demons bore witness to the fact that Jesus was the Son of God. It was an identification of Jesus (in humanity) because the Son of God (in Deity). It affects the doctrine with the Person of Christ.

9:8 "marvelled" is changed to "were afraid." There is no reason to believe that the people were afraid because Jesus healed the sick of the palsy. There is every reason for them to marvel at the miracle.

9:13 "to repentance" is left out. The Bible doctrine of repentance is one particular that males would like to do away with. God requires that in order for being saved one should truly repent (Acts 17:30; two Peter three:9). The word means "a modify of mind" and there need to be that concerning God, sin and salvation. Men think that sin does not really separate them from God--they need to adjust their mind about that. Men think that salvation is by works--they need to change their mind about that. There is nothing more evident right now than the absence of repentance among those that are professing to become converted.

15:8 "draweth nigh unto me with their mouth" is left out. According to Isaiah 29:13 it belongs in because Isaiah prophesied of these hypocrites exactly that way.

16:2,three "When it is evening ... the signs with the times" is all omitted. The Pharisees and Sadducees came looking for a sign and the signs were all around them. Jesus called them hypocrites because they could not tell the signs of your times.

17:21 Whole verse is left out. Power with God is to get had by prayer and fasting. That is a fundamental truth of your Phrase of God.

18:2 "Jesus" is left out. This is done numerous times by the corrupt Greek Text of Westcott and Hort. I have not chosen to remark about each instance because it would add a lot of pages to this operate. The majority Text continuously places the phrase "Jesus" in the narrative with the definite post preceding it. Thus it places him in the center of things and in command. It is doctrinally unsound for such prominence to become discarded for the phrase "he."

18:eleven The whole verse is omitted. This verse tells us that man is lost, that he needs to be saved, and that the Son of man is the one particular who can do that. The doctrine of salvation through Jesus Christ is impacted by this change.

18:15 "against thee" is omitted. This omission sets us up as watchdogs over others and if one particular sins we are to go and tell him. Such is not the teaching of Scripture. Were we to declare every sin we would be constantly busy (bodies) judging the actions and motives of everyone. This adjust is a very bad error.

18:35 "their trespasses" is omitted. Same thought as mentioned in 18:15.

19:9 "and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery" is removed. This is a very important doctrinal modify which concerns divorce and remarriage. A man who divorces his wife and remarries commits adultery, and also the man who marries the divorced wife commits adultery.

19:16,17 "Good" before Master is omitted. In addition to that, the phrase "Why callest thou me good?" is changed to "Why askest thou me concerning the good?" Good Master is correct and Jesus responded to show the young man that only a single was good and that 1 was God. The conclusion should have been obvious. Given that Jesus was good he was necessarily God. The omission and modify destroys the intended testimony to your Deity of Christ.

20:16 "for several be called, but few chosen" is left out. The Lord would have us know that numerous are called to inherit eternal life, but few are chosen by virtue of believing in Christ. It is a Bible doctrine that God wants all men to get saved but few will come to Christ for salvation.

21:12 "of God" is out. Jesus, who was God in the flesh, came to his own temple and said, "My house shall be called the house of prayer." It was the temple of God and the God of your temple was there.

22:30 "of God" is removed. You'll find good angels and fallen angels. The believers, in the resurrection, will be like the good angels "of God" who alone are in heaven.

23:8 "Master" is changed to "instructor." There are plenty of lecturers but only a single master. The alter here takes away the pre- eminence that God intends for his Son.

25:13 "wherein the Son of man cometh" is omitted. The warning to watch is tied to the imminent return with the Lord. The omission here does away with the doctrine of the Lord's second advent.

26:28 "new" is dropped before testament. The apostle Paul tells us that Jesus said, "this cup is the new testament in my blood." The modify here is intended to corrupt the Word of God and also to confuse Christians.

27:35 "that it might be fulfilled ... did they cast lots" is all omitted. It is very important in Matthew's gospel, in which Jesus is portrayed because the King of Israel, to show that he's the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. Here the parting of his garments and casting lots is the fulfillment of Psalm 22:18 which portrays the crucifixion of Christ. To omit this is to show the intended corruption of the Word of God from the textual critics.

28:6 "the Lord" is omitted. The very reverent angels explained, "see the place where the Lord lay." They would not say, "see the place wherever he lay." The frequent attempt to humanize Jesus and take away from his Deity does not endear the Westcott and Hort Greek Text to believers.



MARK

1:one "the Son of God" is left out. These words present Jesus Christ as Deity. Such an omission is a direct attack around the person of Christ and is without doubt a doctrinal error.

one:31 "immediately" is dropped. The descriptive word tells us once the fever left her and therefore provides us with a miracle. The term left out denies the miracle and thus the one particular who performed it.

2:17 "to repentance" is left out. See comments on Matt. 9:13.

3:15 "to heal sicknesses" is omitted. Jesus gave them authority to heal diseases as properly as to cast out demons. Sickness is the result of sin (Adam's) and the only 1 who has authority to eliminate it is the a single who would die for sin. On the basis of his approaching death for sin on Calvary he could say, "Son, thy sins be forgiven thee" and "Rise up and walk."

four:24 "and unto you that hear shall more be given" is left out. It is a Bible teaching that people that seek truth through the Lord shall be given a lot more truth (see John 7:17).

5:36 "as soon" is dropped. The phrase in the Greek is "right away." The word immediately is continuously dropped from the Revisers of 1881. It is a key term in Mark which is the Gospel of your Servant of the Lord who came "not to become ministered unto, but to minister." When Jairus was informed that his daughter was dead and that he really should not trouble Jesus further, the Lord "immediately" encouraged him to believe.

6:11 "Verily I say unto you, It shall be far more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment, than for that city" is removed in the text. This passage emphasizes the great degree of responsibility that was upon those cities who heard the Lord's apostles as they preached repentance and worked miracles before them. Sodom and Gomorrah didn't have such light, yet they are nevertheless suffering the eternal wrath of God (see Jude 7 in which "suffering" is in the present tense). How much much more the judgment of America today where people sit in an abundance of total revelation from God and choose to remain in darkness.

7:8 "as the washing of pots and cups: and numerous other such like things ye do" is omitted. The Lord not only condemns the Pharisees for traditions of adult males, but he names them. There are traditions of males today which are sending people to Hell and preachers need to title them. It is doctrinally unsound to let guys go on in traditions and not expose them.

9:23 "if thou canst believe" is dropped. The father had mentioned to Jesus, "if thou canst do anything." To this lack of faith Jesus answered, "if thou canst believe." It was at once a rebuke and an encouragement to have faith in him. The father's answer in the next verse is beautiful but the Revisers ruined that also. They omitted "with tears, Lord" through the most precious answer as recorded by the Spirit of God.

9:45 "into the fire that never shall be quenched" is dropped. The character and duration of Hell is described here and the doctrine of eternal retribution is impacted by this alter.

9:47 "fire" is omitted. The words are inspired and in complete arrangement with Rev. 20:15. The consignment from the lost for the lake of fire is a Bible doctrine.

10:21 "take up the cross" is left out. The phrase to your young man was to divest himself of the riches in which he trusted, consider himself dead for the world, and follow Christ into eternal life. There are lots of who will let go of riches and seek to emulate some of Christ's teachings, but the way with the cross they refuse. The cross for Christ and for believers is Fundamental in Christian doctrine.

ten:24 "for them that trust in riches" is left out. This is a very glaring doctrinal error. It is not hard to enter into the kingdom of God (salvation is a free gift through faith in Jesus Christ) but it is hard for people who trust in riches to trust Christ alone for salvation. Their God is their wealth and it is no a lot more compatible with Christ than Dagon was with the Ark of God (see 1 Sam. 5:1-5).

eleven:26 The whole verse is removed. It is a Bible doctrine that if we regard iniquity in our heart the Lord will not hear us. Answered prayer and clean vessels go together. When I confess my sins and ask God for favor he requires that my confession of sin include forgiveness of people who have sinned against me. If I refuse to forgive others it becomes sin to me (see Eph. 4:32).

13:14 "spoken of by Daniel the prophet" is dropped. Without the reference to Daniel the appeal to understand is without force. Though some might connect it in their thoughts because they are familiar with Scripture, it does not comply with that he is referring to Daniel. The reference to Daniel from the Lord also authenticates his writing as inspired Scriptures.

14:22 "eat" is dropped. Our Lord did not give them a relic in the Last Supper to take home and cherish. He gave them broken bread to eat which (when observed) would often remind them of his body which was broken for them.

15:28 The whole verse is left out. Jesus was crucified between two thieves in fulfillment of Isaiah 53:12. It is doctrinal error to eliminate clear statements concerning the fulfilling of prophecy (see Luke 24:27).

16:9-20 Twelve verses are omitted. These verses are found in every known manuscript but two (the oldest of individuals two leaves a blank space wherever it belongs). They are found in all the Variations, quoted through the church fathers,Microsoft Office Professional 2010, and seen in the lectionaries from the church. There are numerous doctrines affected by the omission of those twelve verses. The resurrection of Christ is deleted. The great commission, baptism, eternal damnation and His ascension into Heaven are all taken out with the Phrase of God. Certainly the gospel does not end with "they were afraid." Some say the ending has been lost (see Dr. Ryrie's Study Bible) but that destroys the Bible Doctrine that God preserves His Word (see one Peter 1:23-25). The evidence is clear that these verses are original and also to cut them out is to affect a lot of doctrines with the Christian faith.



LUKE

1:28 "blessed art thou among women" is omitted. There were several virgins in Israel at the time, but God chose Mary. The Son that she bore would be her Saviour from sin. The Roman Catholic doctrine from the immaculate conception of Mary (concerning her birth) is nothing but pagan fiction. Mary was blessed AMONG women, but not Previously mentioned women. The worship of Mary is contrary to Scripture. This omission is designed to lift her over others and eventually deify her.

two:14 "peace, good will toward men" is changed to "peace among men of good will." The first talks of your birth of Christ as bringing God's peace and good will (reconciliation) to adult males. Faith in the death of Christ for our sins brings justification and peace with God. The modify offers God's peace to men who are good. That is doctrinally unsound given that there is none good.

two:33 "Joseph and his mother" is changed to "his father and mother." The Spirit of God is very careful to show that our Lord Jesus Christ was born of a virgin and that he did not have a human father who begat him. The alter casts doubt upon the doctrine of your virgin birth of Christ since the "seed of the woman." Later, when Mary refers to Joseph as "thy father," Jesus answers with, "wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business," meaning that God was his father (see 2:48,49).

2:40 "in spirit" is left out. That the child grew and waxed strong in spirit (meaning that he was spiritually strong) is evident from verse 47. It is unlikely that the Spirit of God wanted us to see how strong Jesus was with reference to his physique.

2:43 "and Joseph and his mother knew not of it" is changed to "and his parents were unaware of it." The first retains the teachings of the virgin birth, the second discards it. The virgin birth is a Fundamental doctrine from the Christian faith and the majority Text upholds it. Let us not hear of supposed overzealous copyists but rather let us beware of overzealous heretics who would deny the fundamentals from the faith.

four:4 "but by every Term of God" is dropped. Many are willing to agree that bread alone can not satisfy man, but few are willing to live by every phrase of God. This quotation is from Deut. 8:3 wherever the omitted words are found. The same a single who mentioned, "Yea, hath God explained?" is the author of this omission. The Revisers could not leave this passage in because they have changed "every word of God" in above 5,000 places in the brand new Testament. Satan does not mind if we read the Bible as long as we have a Swiss cheese Bible (full of holes). Holes in the Word lead to doubts in the Phrase, doubts result in faith for being lost, and without faith it is impossible to please him.

4:8 "Get thee behind me, Satan" is omitted. The devil had tempted Jesus to bypass the cross and receive the kingdom more than the world. Jesus, whose face was set as a flint to go to the cross, refused to worship him.

6:ten "whole as the other" is left out. These words tell us that not only was his hand restored to use but it was whole because the other. The completeness with the miracle is attested to by these words.

9:54 "even as Elias did" is omitted. Apart from this phrase they had no precedent for doing such a thing.

9:55,Windows 7 License, 56 "and explained,Windows 7 X86, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For your Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them" is omitted. In reply to your disciples who thought that they could call down fire from heaven, Jesus told them that he came to save adult males. This passage is consistent with John three:17, "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved."

11:2-4 "Our ... which art in heaven" is deleted along with "Thy will be done as in heaven, so in earth" and "but deliver us from evil." Only corrupt manuscripts can produce so numerous departures in the disciples prayer which is found without deletions in Matt. 6:9-13.

14:five The term "ass" is changed to "son." The use of "son" is too much for that comparison the Lord is making. Only a slavish loyalty to a corrupt Greek text can produce such a foolish change.

22:31 "And the Lord said" is dropped. The Lord Jesus was God and as such he was omnipresent and omniscient. He was present when Satan came before God and asked permission to try Peter's faith. He had prayed to your Father, as Peter's intercessor, that his faith would not fail. It was the Lord who knew all of this and warned Peter specifically.

22:64 "they struck him within the face" is dropped. It is error to minimize the sufferings of Christ. His facial appearance was marred more than any man (see Isaiah 52:14 and 53:5).

23:23 "and with the chief priests" is omitted. The Lord was careful to let us know that the religious priests were involved in the rejection of Christ. Those that call themselves priests these days do likewise.

23:42 "And he stated unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom" is changed to "Then he said, Jesus remember me when you come into your kingdom." The confession that Jesus is Lord is doctrinally correct because it is required for salvation (see Rom. ten:9- 13).

23:45 "the sun was darkened" is changed to "the sun was eclipsed." The Greek term in the corrupt Greek Text is EKLIPONTOS from which we derive the phrase ECLIPSE. An eclipse is caused through the natural occurrence of your moon passing amongst the sun and the earth and usually lasts for about 3-5 minutes. The sun being darkened for three hours was a miracle of God and will be repeated again prior to your Lord's return to earth (see Matt. 24:29) Numerous modern-day variations try to hide the Greek phrase they are employing to translate in the corrupt Greek text by making use of words like: obscured (NASV), faded (AMPLIFIED), stopped shining (NIV), failed (NEW WORLD), but some honestly translate the phrase "eclipse" (20th CENTURY, MOFFAT, NEB, PHILLIPS). Humanism would try to find some way to explain away the miracles of God's Term lest they be forced to take it because the revelation from God concerning salvation.

24:36 "and saith unto them. Peace be unto you" is omitted. Jesus had explained to them, "Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you" (John 14:27). He was now risen from your dead and in their midst to guarantee that peace to them. A single from the greatest benefits of our salvation is to have peace with God (Rom. five:1) and the peace of God ruling in our hearts (Phil. 4:7).

24:40 The whole verse is omitted. The bodily resurrection of Christ is proven here as he showed them his hands and his feet. The omission affects Bible doctrine very much.

24:51 "and carried up into heaven" is left out. The bodily ascension of Christ into heaven is a Bible doctrine that is denied here. It leaves the Lord parted from them but does not tell us in which he went. The Revisers removed the doctrine and left the Word in a poor state of disarray. Acts 1:one, 2 tells us that the "former treatise" (Luke) ended with Jesus being "taken up." That ought to be sufficient to show the Revisers are wrong.

24:52 "And ... worshipped him" is omitted through the NASV. The bulk Text says, "And they having worshipped him returned to Jerusalem with great joy." The picture we have is of our Lord receiving their worship because he is God (see 4:8 in which worship is to become to God only) and then before their very eyes ascending into heaven. It is a Bible doctrine that we are to worship Jesus and the omission through the NASV is a clear denial of that doctrine.



JOHN

1:18 "the only begotten Son" is changed to "The only begotten God." Such a phrase is foreign to Scripture. It accommodates the Arian teaching that Christ was a lesser deity created by God. It agrees with the teaching of Origen that Christ was not equal with God in essence and nature. Sound Fundamental doctrine concerning Christ is that he's one person of the Triune God and that he proceeds in the Father by an eternal generation and reveals God to males because the Son of God.

one:27 "He it is ... who is preferred before me" is removed. This modify removes the pre-eminence and pre-existence of Christ. John wanted us to see that even though Christ came after him, he in reality preceded and ranked previously mentioned him.

3:13 "which is in heaven" is omitted. This modify affects the doctrine of your omnipresence of Christ. As man he was here on earth, as God he was able to get everywhere present. The omission is a corruption introduced by those who do not believe in the perfect and absolute Deity of Christ.

3:15 "really should not perish" is removed. This deletion removes the opposite of everlasting life, which is to perish. The doctrine of eternal damnation is weakened from the adjust.

3:16 "his only begotten Son" is changed to "the only begotten Son." The phrase HIS marks Jesus Christ out as God's own peculiar son in a relationship that no one else has. It marks him as with the same essence and nature. The Deity of Christ is involved and is thereby weakened (3:17 also changed).

four:42 "the Christ" is left out. The purpose of John's gospel as given in 20:31 was to lead people to believe that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of God. That belief was to bring life to them. To omit it here is to deny the purpose of your inspired writer.

5:3b, 4 The statement regarding the moving with the water by an angel and subsequent miraculous healing is removed. Really should this deletion be permitted there would be no sense to verse 7 given that that verse presupposes 5:3b, four. This is an effort to remove the miraculous through the Bible and thus accommodate humanism.

five:16 "and sought to slay him" is omitted. The Scripture teaches us that on several occasions they tried to kill Jesus but by supernatural power were kept from doing so (see John 18:6). He was omnipotent and there was no way they could take him until his hour was come.

6:47 "on me" is left out. The object of faith has been removed here. Everlasting life does not come to people who believe, but to those who believe on Christ. This is doctrinal error of the gravest sort and has been carried about into the NASV and NIV.

7:8 The little phrase "yet" is dropped and the result is that the Lord appears to lie to his brothers, given that he did go up towards the feast. There is a world of difference among "I go not up YET" and "I go not up." The sinlessness of Christ is an indispensable doctrine of the Christian faith and lying is sin.

7:53-8:11 The whole story with the woman taken in adultery is omitted. This is 1 of the most blessed portions from the Word of God. It is intended by God through the inspired writer to amplify what came before in three:17. The law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ (1:17).

8:38 The words "my Father" and "your father" are intended to show the difference amongst his father and their father, who was Satan. By removing the word "my" and "your" there is a deliberate attempt to remove the offence and cater to your false dream of your Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man.

8:39 "If ye were Abraham's children" is changed to "if ye are Abraham's children." The Lord intended them to see that they were not Abraham's children at all. The alter gives us to see that they were Abraham's children and therefore they ought to act like it. This is pure humanism and contrary to sound doctrine.

9:four "I ought to perform the works of him that sent me" is changed to "We must function the works of him that sent us." The uniqueness of Christ as the Sent One of your Father is destroyed and he's placed equally with the disciples as sent from God to do the function of God. This is an attack about the Person and Work of Christ and it exalts humanism. Jesus was sent from the Father and the disciples were sent by Jesus, "as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you."

9:35 "the Son of God" is changed to "the Son of man." The thing to become believed in John's gospel is that Jesus is the Son of God (20:31). The change from the minority texts is not warranted.

10:38 "that ye may know, and believe" is changed to "that ye may know, and understand." The union of Christ and the Father within the Godhead is that which we are to believe and rely upon for your certainty of our salvation. To understand the union is beyond human comprehension and if it could be understood, that would still not be the equivalent of salvation.

eleven:41 "wherever the dead was laid" is removed. God intends that we really should know that this was the very same place in which Lazarus was laid. This is an attempt to cloud the evident miracle which followed. (see also 12:two wherever "which had been dead" is also removed).

Next Web page