mailto:owner-x3d-public@web3d.org] on
behalf of len bullard neat. i am going to search at this when the brain is firing yet again. i've been at this
hard with the previous couple of days and i am acquiring punchy. i just place up an additional version in the x3d ajaxed sequencer with all the
sai/dom html performing what it's intended to for this pass. occasionally it
stalls within the initial load. that is certainly obvious simply because the loadsensor doesn't
fade absent. do a refresh, and it generally works. when the x3d is koscher, the
loadsensor is a rather excellent way to inform the consumer and also the html to put alone
into functioning mode, so the coordination with the dashboard performs okay. in case the
loadsensor stops prior to 100%,
Tiffany Bracelet, it can be an ok test that one thing is lacking in
the assets so functions as being a secondary check too. t'would be nice when the
editors had a switch to spit out a loadsensor aspect so we don't build
these by hand. perhaps an excellent xslt workout. enjoyable little app. once the decide on is implemented,
Tiffany Engagement Ring, it will likely be a decent illustration
of a full up doing work ajaxx3d software. not fancy looking html,
Pandora Braclets States don’, but for
tutorial reasons that works far better and i can go back again and improve the css. many thanks for the ajax tutorial, joe. really useful the moment i worked the examples
completely. len from: owner-x3d-public@web3d.org [mailto:owner-x3d-public@web3d.org] on
behalf of joe d williams >>> <imagetexture def="kamala"
>>> containerfield='texture' >>note that this is the default value, so you never have to enter it.
>>that's the case for almost every occurrence of containerfield, it is
>>best to ignore it. >right. since that is certainly 'almost', it would be interesting to hear the
>exceptions. okay. let his begin a multi-part series on exceprions for containerfield, :) well. if you always refer to the xml schema,
Tiffany And Co Canada, there should be none. which is,
Tiffanys Engagement Rings, you should be able to figure out if a node is correctly structured re content and hierarchy by reference to the schema. the schema should be able to tell you that a node can or cannot be considered a root or a child of the particular node. simply because we have a smart schema,
Pandora Necklaces, and because from the way that the xml encoding is structured,
Pandora Bracelet, the 'container' nodes are not a feature. case in point: shape { appearance appearance { material material } geometry sphere
} could be <shape> <appearance> <appearance> <material> <material /> </material> </appearance> </appearance> <geometry> <sphere /> </geometry>
</shape> using the schema for reference, we can simplfy to <shape> <appearance> <material /> </appearance> <sphere />
</shape> due to the fact the tool can look up the sphere 's container field to see if it is okay to appear there. that utility is a basis for your idea of defining a content model using a schema. ... thanks and best regards,
Pandora Canada, joe -------------------------------------------------------------------------
for list subscription/unsubscription,
Pandora Charms,
go to -------------------------------------------------------------------------
for list subscription/unsubscription,
go to -------------------------------------------------------------------------
for list subscription/unsubscription,
go to