Origin of Chinese civilization and the formation of several issues need attention
Increasing the breadth and depth of methods, procedures and adhere to the traditional methods of archaeological archaeologists have become increasingly incompatible, so how should we regard this new situation, how to deal with the relationship between archeology archeology and technology, will have a different understanding. One view, it seems that the use of technological means more to the dominant position of the impact of the archeology, the archeology of the nature of the change; another view,
Beats By Dre Headphones, it seems that technology is the real science of archeology archeology. Obviously these two understandings are incomplete, incorrect. In my opinion, archeology and nature of the dominant position, is determined by the archaeological purposes, the purpose has not changed, its dominant position will not change; scientific and technological means and methods of using the more information obtained the history of reconciliation and 7 back to the meal artifacts. 2oo9 ~ 6 period. The more information out of the analysis, the more close to archaeological understanding of ancient society, that the purpose of its evolution. Of course, I also do not support real science and technology archaeological archaeological argument, this argument obscures the fundamental purpose and mission of archeology, confusing the distinction between ends and means. Technological means, methods, and then advanced, the use was more, it can only solve problems and answer technical level, but can not solve and answer social science dimension. Archaeology on the face of scientific and technological means, methods using more and more new situation, not to emphasize the points of archaeological and technology, but to emphasize the two together. Together talking about here is the integration of geology, as previously borrowed for archaeological stratigraphy, paleontology, archeology taxonomy is borrowed, respectively, as the two major theoretical pillars of archeology, as the two basic methods of cooperation. When reached such a state, which belongs to the original subject is not important, because this time it is fully integrated into the archaeological and become an integral part of the archeology. Of course, when the archaeological remains unchanged even though the purpose of, but certainly will be greatly changed the face of a. Six senior scholars, how to deal with the academic achievements of academic research is relay,
mulberry outlet, senior research results, which researchers often start was the foundation and starting point. Respect the results of senior scholars, senior scholars, carrying forward the results of the later researchers should uphold the basic attitude. Proved, and only so can the later study the researchers to new heights. But we must see, things are developing and changing, academic research and will not stay in one place is no longer move, and later results in succession under the premise of senior scholars, some of them negative, amendment, supplement the normal , otherwise there will be no new academic development,
GHD Glätteisen günstig, the new increase. On this issue, arrogant, lack of respect for senior scholars of academic achievement, without analysis of blindly deny, of course, is wrong; but in order to maintain the academic status of senior scholars, young academics based on new discoveries and new methods 8 senior scholars questioned the thesis that negative attitude is not desirable, and does not have to look far ahead of the senior scholars would like to see. The origin of ancient Chinese civilization in the formation of research,
knock off oakleys, Mr. Su Bingqi greatest contribution is undoubtedly the most authoritative. His origin and development of Chinese civilization, the origins of ancient civilizations, the younger generation in research, But this does not mean that no discussion of Mr. Su's view of the Department, such as division of the Department of the six areas, the Yellow River civilization is the secondary type of civilization point of view there are different views. In fact, Mr. Su himself, during his lifetime never think that their view is not discussed. On the contrary, he is very happy to hear different opinions, especially in opposition, because he knows that only by understanding different points of view, he can not be party to make their views more complete, more to convince others. Mr. Su's mind as wide as the sea, his open-minded attitude towards different opinions and different perspectives on the active support of confrontation, always worth learning. About several aspects of the above, some research, and civilization began with the formation of directly related,
ed hardy uk, while others are currently facing the common problems of archaeological research. I may not have the correct knowledge, proposed simply to arouse attention. If these insights help to clarify some vague understanding, is conducive to the healthy development of the archaeological discipline, my purpose was achieved. PS: This paper is based on April 2009 in Hebei Yixian Qingxiling at the (Editor Huo Hongwei)
More articles related to topics：
ed hardy canada dck zng ivao ahd
Oakley sunglasses sale wjg tuh mwiv aix
knock off oakleys sgb wtc dolt bhe
Hybrid Mode
