Tods mens shoes ,Tods shoes Auction company refuse

[djhfe079]

,nike air 樱红醉了 2 一千二百年樱保持




implementation of the notice published in accordance with the judge then the phone number and ceramic hybrid manager of the company were contacted Xu,Tods mens shoes, requiring the company to immediately back. Waited in the corridor of time 1 hour, the judge repeated contact with the person in charge of the company, the other party claiming the road,Tods shoes, but the route, where are the other specific issues are ambiguous answer.
the person in charge has not appeared, the Executive Judge of the company immediately decided to go to the fall auction site the auction preview.


judge sentenced release

auction company should credit management

The judge said the auction in today's society more and more known by the public, More and more people into the auction was somewhat mysterious selection of merchandise. But ordinary people, as the buyer, the prevalence of the amount of product knowledge are buying less, shallow understanding of the actual situation.
in the antiques market, the prevailing trade rules at your own risk. Devices for antique goods that the buyer identified on their own, even after the transaction by the buyer's own imitation products also bear the responsibility. But for this particular seller the auction company, its team of experts has identified more advantages such as resources and information, and auction items for its offer legitimate and effective certificate of authenticity. It is based on the auction company and its team of experts, identification certificates of the trust, the people involved before daring to buy such as antique porcelain, jade and other similar goods. Auction company to have more resources to better position as a party, should take responsibility for the public to its strict control of goods by auction, while regulating their own behavior, integrity management.
case playback

sham trial courts in the case of the two sub-Plaintiff wins

2008 年 12 months,Tods womens shoes ,Tod's Shoes 董事长挪用八千万公款炒股致企业巨亏受审(图), Mr. Liu Ka purchased from antique porcelain 8 They are Camel, Mr. Liu to the CNS has paid the company 257,400 yuan, the company is Mr. Xiang Liu CNS provides a genuine certificate of authenticity.
8 numbers of Mr. Liu to find someone to identify. Expert conclusion is that, the 8 pieces of porcelain were modern imitations. Mr. Yu Shiliu CNS at the end of 2009 the company sued the Chaoyang Court.
Chaoyang Court held that the two sides of the identification certificate for the batch of porcelain, the authenticity and identification as an expert who had no objection to that contract of sale is reached, both sides are based on a certificate of authenticity and identification of people items identified by the trust involved only transactions. Verified by the court,男子砍游戏机店店员40余刀抢2000元, recognized as a modern imitation products involved goods, therefore, the court finds that the parties reached a contract of sale exists in the sale of the subject's misunderstanding of the contract for the sale should be removed.
after the first trial made, the Company, and against the appeal from the hospital. Second instance upheld. CNS has failed to perform due to the judgment obligations, in June this year, Mr. Liu made to the Chaoyang Court to enforce application.