(Reporter Credit Risk Management) because of family property more than 800 million legal income, and corruption and 740,000 yuan, Hualian Road Engineering Materials Co., Ltd. Zhu, former general manager was on corruption charges, large amounts of property from unidentified sources first instance sentenced 18 years in prison. Zhu refused to accept an appeal, the case today in the Beijing Second Intermediate Court of second instance trial.
Zhu, 49, had studied in Britain, is a Doctor of Engineering. March 2005, formally took office and is responsible for Zhu Hualian company's overall work. In early 2008, the Hualian consecutive losses, Zhu was removed from office. In the following the departure of the financial examination, Zhu was found to have economic problems. When the investigation team and talk to him, Zhu said that the company can treat the interests of consumers, but Zhu stated in the invoice for some restaurants do not know, but do not know where the restaurant. Zhu leave during the audit in the staff dining in addition to invoices and fuel card found in the issue, also found his wife Zhu glasses to shoot artistic photos, the cost of the concert to see Andy Lau and his son when the best camera in the kid's costs reimbursement in the unit.
Court of First Instance examined, June 2005-March 2008 period, Zhu Junli with his office, by means of false claims of 74 million yuan will be illegal for himself. After the incident, investigation organs inquiry, seizure, freezing of the Zhu's family property, in addition to seizure of proceeds of crime and corruption documented legitimate income, 873 million yuan Zhu on the property could not explain the legal sources. Court of First Instance sentenced Zhu to 12 years imprisonment, confiscation of property 20 million, with a huge unidentified property Zhu was sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years, decided to implement 18 years imprisonment, confiscation of property 20 million.
today in court, Zhu notes that are involved in reimbursement on public spending, not personal corruption. Zhu prosecutors to explain the reimbursement bills will appear in concert Andy Lau, kid good photography when the cost of spectacles invoice how it was. Zhu said that he took personal notes strike a balance,
gucci pas cher, but the actual expenditure is on public expenditure, which is the company's common practice. The Hualian company certifying that the unit does not strike a balance with the individual invoice system. Zhu also said that he is the legitimate source of all the property, he has royalties, stocks, property and other sources of borrowing, but he is difficult to make clear the details. Debate in the trial, prosecutors pointed out that the first instance court for error of law, Zhu Jun, the behavior of large amounts of property of unknown origin occurred in the Criminal Law Amendment (g) promulgated earlier in accordance with the principles from the old and lighter, should be in 5 years in prison for this crime The following sentence.
link
how to calculate the unknown sources of property
huge amount of property from unidentified sources, the State whose property or expenditure obviously exceeds legitimate income, the difference great, I can not explain the source is legitimate behavior. The property mentioned here refers to the behavior of people actually own the property, including housing, transport and deposit. Expenditure refers to the behavior of people have money and goods of foreign payments, including the grant funds and materials to others. Legitimate income,
Sac Louis Vuitton Mahina, is required by law belongs to the legitimate possession of the property acts, such as wages,
dior pas cher, bonuses, inheritance, acceptance of gifts, donations. Criminal law, national staff of the property, spending significantly more than their legitimate income, the difference between the large, may order the source of the national staff, can not explain the source, the difference of the ill-gotten gains, at five years of imprisonment or criminal detention; difference Special huge, more than 5 years 10 years imprisonment. The difference between the property to be recovered.