Although the sale of housing in the hand, and the contract clearly stipulates procedures for transfer after 5 years, but now to a period of 5 years, the owner has determined the contract is invalid, the parties then to court. Yesterday, the court heard Yanshan Fangshan court case.
reason
transfer deadline but go back to the seller
six in the Fangshan district Yanshan wind,
louis vuitton belts, there is a construction area of 124.14 square meters of housing,
coach store, 42-year-old Mr. Chang and his family lived here, but recently, the house became a family matter the most suck. Mr. Zhang is not only the original owner of the house does not meet the transfer,
mbt shoes, also often family court, said that his original contract null and void the sale of housing, the house should go to all his.
Zhang is the owner of the house, in February 2006, he sold the house, Mr. Chang, the current ask prices for 24 million yuan, but did not transfer. 5 years later, Mr. Chang Mr. Chang would like to still room to transfer the name, but did not receive each other's cooperation.
seller
is the fitness room for the contract shall be null and void
Zhang said that the reason does not meet the transfer,
coach outlet store, because when you sell, not according to their own sale of the state of affordable housing. In accordance with relevant state regulations, affordable housing buyers have limited property rights, the purchase by the fitness room under 5 years may not be directly traded, buyers who really need to transfer due to special reasons, and to the original price by the government and to consider the depreciation and repurchase price level and other factors.
Mr Zhang said: in accordance with the payment of 1,000 yuan per month, the time for the February 19, 2006 start date to the actual refund of housing. , then the contract can be lifted. Mr. Chang's agent, said Mr. Chang raise funds to purchase housing units of housing is not the strict sense of the affordable housing. Purchase in 2006, and Beijing, the fitness room management approach presented in 2007, is after the purchase of the house. In addition, Mr. Chang also pointed out that a contract for the sale terms, said: on the agreement: this room for the new affordable housing, so both parties first, the housing transactions, to be national policy to allow, and then procedures for transfer.
Zhang's agent plaintiffs refute this immediately to give his name, Mr. Chang said there were several houses, according to State regulations can not be checked for network housing transfer procedures and formalities, it does not meet the transfer does not exist problems. No court case verdict, the case is still pending. Morning News reporter Xun Mi