After the man has bought two million yuan antiques

□ reporter SOUTHERN correspondent Chen Li

Evening News bought the antique value of 200 million,louis vuitton outlet store, later known as counterfeits and refused to pay, therefore the seller Miss Tian Lee sued. Recently, Jiading District Court made Nanxiang court verdict on the case was ordered to pay the buyer Miss Xiang Tian Li paragraph 2 million yuan to buy antiques and interest on overdue payments.
2007 年 12 months, the Lee family to purchase the plaintiff Miss Tian Ming and Qing antiques and other artifacts during the 23 cases, both parties agree these antiques worth 200 million yuan. Subsequently, Mr. Lee issued a list of antiques, records the name of each antique, the value of such information. Get a list, then Mr. Xiang Li Miss Tian delivered these antique objects.
smooth delivery of the goods of the Li unwilling to pay, no fruit after several rounds of consultations, Tian Ms Lee to court, asking the court to order Lee to pay 200 million loan and interest on overdue payments.
Lee acknowledged the buyer as a defendant on the list things that are holding their own,coach outlet store, but said Miss Tian sell their so-called Lee claimed to know nothing of cultural appreciation, Ms. Wada is the same village as fellow villagers out of the trust was to buy these so-called antiques. After the purchase, he felt very at ease, the Trustee requested the antiques market experts knew after being Miss Tian Lee said that from what Miss Tian purchased his home has been delivered to the store, he now not only unwilling to pay, and requires these
the face of accusations, lying Miss Tian said Lee,coach outlet, Mr. Lee several times before purchasing your experts, is to determine the correct decision to buy before. Meanwhile, Miss Tian expressed reluctance to take back these have sold antiques.
court held that Mr. Lee to Miss Tian purchase antique artifacts, field inventory and write the receipt list, clear the payment, the contract between the two is legally valid. Lee said Miss Tian antique artifacts for sale are counterfeit goods, according to the law, Mr. Lee should provide evidence to the court for this to be proved . Lee as a full capacity for civil conduct prior to the transaction on the purchase of antique items without any form of identification, and in the re-inspection after the transaction is inconsistent with common sense. Therefore, the present case, although Mr. Lee claims that its purchase of counterfeit goods to antiques, but the basis of inadequate, the court shall not be supported. Mr. Lee after receiving the items, do not pay the purchase price,nike shox, should bear the corresponding liability for breach. In sum, then the court made the ruling in Jiading.
Nanxiang Court Court of Jiading President Zhu said that the current antiques market was mixed, collecting antiques not only considerable economic strength, but also have a certain ability to identify. The buyer before the transaction do Otherwise, in case of disputes, in the delivery of the subject matter of the case has been completed, the buyer prove rather difficult, litigation risk can only be themselves. Buyers and sellers should learn (Editor: SN026)