consumers in Beijing Hualian supermarket to buy a 3.07 yuan of goods, can be received by 3.1 million, will no longer give change. Consumers very seriously, that the supermarket no right to April 19 morning, the city Yaohai court hearing of the case, the supermarket consumers paid 3 cents in court, and are willing to bear the costs.
the name of the consumer now has a nickname, called again. Some people say that As long as the benefits to give to others, I am willing.
rights track to hit five or six ten Hefei case
and so on, until August or September 2010 when I came to Hefei,
mbt shoes, the supermarket began a prosecution of the proceedings of the way.
I chose the paladin as ancient as the road will see the injustice his help. can own the rights. make him difficult to accept. So he stayed in Hefei,
nike shoes uk, began the prosecution of the road, copies of judgments, so to me, consumers and even businesses are a good thing, because it allows businesses to avoid certain risks, consumers can know how to rights. prosecution of man I do not care,
louis vuitton handbags, as long as the rights to awaken the public consciousness, it is worth.
activists hope everyone can aim to become brother
Reporter: Are you in the end is ######## or rights in it?
Reporter: What is the purpose you do?
can also increase the cost of illegal businesses.
Reporter: Why did you choose to go to the business sector or the quality supervision department to complaints?
Reporter: Do you feel and Fang, Jing Wang, and have high What is the difference?
In fact, I do hope all consumers to use legal weapons to protect their own interests, so we got quite used to no longer call me prosecution of man
rights interests of told reporters: access charges, or access to industry and commerce, quality supervision department of the awards, to feed myself and for the next round of rights. one-third of the money will play a lawsuit. is only a means to an end. And I do not care about the success of each case, but want to court, so that businesses attach importance to the interests of consumers. Litigation is not a waste of resources?
aware of their mistakes, acknowledge and correct their mistakes, my purpose is achieved. If they do not admit mistakes, do not correct, then the case will play in the end. resources, as long as the courts out of a verdict,
louis vuittion bags, you can put an end to all similar phenomena, for example, Carrefour reported sales of expired my cup to get a verdict in favor, and now believe that many consumers will buy a paper cup to see if the time expires This is a good thing. there has been a driving force. awareness of those rights is not very strong , in this case, such an action can not only wake up the people's rights awareness, but also better than the illegal rights, such rights can be advocated way. Director Wu said. are consumers, the consumer can understand the frustration of consumers not want to protect their own rights, but rather forced. High cost of rights issues, has become a consumer / p> (Editor: SN026)